By Mark Waite
County Commissioner Lorinda Wichman said a couple of statements made to ratepayers of Pahrump Utility Company weren’t true, but the board still voted 3-2 to increase the contract for a law firm negotiating the possible county purchase of the utility.
Incoming commissioners Frank Carbone and Donna Cox voted against the request to increase the contract with the law firm of Kaempfer, Crowell, Renshaw, Gronauer and Fiorentino by $30,000, up to a maximum of $40,000.
“In the best interest of the welfare of the majority of the people in Pahrump, I can’t support this. I just think if the seller wants to sell something, the seller should bear the burden of the payments; it comes out of his pockets, not the taxpayers,” Cox said.
County Commissioner Dan Schinhofen asked if Cox attended a meeting of Pahrump Utility Company ratepayers where a majority favored the takeover.
He told Cox, “I kind of take umbrage that you speak for the majority.”
Former county commissioner Joni Eastley, whose term expired in December, had consistently cast the sole vote against contracts for the acquisition; she didn’t feel it was the county’s job to be acquiring a private utility company.
“Publicly, I believe that the users of this system have been misled in statements that were made to them that the rates for this service will not increase,” Wichman told commissioners.
If Nye County acquires the system, it will add procurement costs in time and money, she said. The county will also have to pay prevailing wages for any repairs that exceed $100,000 under the Davis Bacon Act.
“For those two simple reasons, I cannot imagine anyone would tell the public, or believe the rates would not go up. When was the last time you’ve seen the rates not go up any time you make a change?” Wichman asked. “I just want everyone to know that my bullshit meter is working.”
Members of the Hafen family sought to reassure ratepayers invited to a meeting at Artesia Community Center in September their rates wouldn’t go up if the county acquired their system. Pahrump Utility Company has 470 metered customers, all but six of them residences, but the system was way overbuilt before the construction business took a dive.
A large majority of ratepayers at the meeting thought Pahrump Utility Company was a good utility system and voiced support for the takeover.
Vicki Hafen Scott told the ratepayers developers were paying standby fees that built the infrastructure to service their subdivisions when construction resumes. The ratepayers would only pay their share of operating expenses to operate the plants.
County Manager Pam Webster said the $10,000 original contract approved in October with the law firm was a preliminary budget, initially to prepare a negotiation plan.
The budget was calculated based on an hourly rate of $325 by attorney Severin Carlson, but could change based on the Public Utilities Commission proceedings.
Mark Fiorentino, an attorney with the firm, was given a $50,000 contract in February 2011 to evaluate water and sewer needs, along with the possible county takeover of private utility companies. His work product was criticized by some officials who said the county’s staff could have completed a similar report for free.
County commissioners last April authorized up to $50,000 for Farr West Engineering to do an engineering evaluation of the utility company. They used left-over money in the contract last month to hire Farr West to do an appraisal.
County auditor Dan McArthur performed an audit of the system for $25,000.
Schinhofen wanted a cap of $40,000 Tuesday on the contract with the law firm in his motion of approval.
He said Pahrump Utility Company has to pay for studies too, the company had to pay $250,000 to get approval of a rate increase from the PUC.
“There’s also costs a private company would incur that we would not incur. There are tradeoffs there and I don’t think anybody said it will never go up, because the cost of living will go up,” Schinhofen said.
Resident Judith Holmgren submitted a statement the contract would only be legal counsel to the county manager’s benefit.
Commissioner Butch Borasky asked if this would be the last payment before the possible purchase; Webster said that’s the plan.
Nye County District Attorney Brian Kunzi said, “We are moving into the final stages of this. While anybody can’t predict the costs, as you know it’s very difficult to predict that, we’re at the stage where we see the finish line where we’re at.”
- Mark Waite / Pahrump Valley Times – Nye County Commissioner Lorinda Wichman apologizes for her “bullshit meter” remark to Tim Hafen and Vicki Hafen Scott, outside commissioners’ chambers Tuesday.



I guess the taxpayers of Nye County need to move on up to the next step by getting aggressive and to consider slapping law suits on these 3 commissioners and slapping liens on their personal property as well as looking into their personal finances.
This is a very bad deal for all the taxpayers of Nye County and those 3 continue to push this adgenda. Why would they knowingly do that with all the unknown future regulations and costs associated with any utility?
If the commissioners continue to move forward to purchase the utility, then it should go on the ballot for a vote of all the taxpayers of Nye County who will get stuck with the future costs to keep this in compliance with government agency’s.
We, the voting public let this happen and the next thing is a taxing district.
In the end we will find out that Hafen has no other “buyer” for his white elephant. He knows that there will be very little growth in Pahrump for years to come and wants to unload the utility on the taxpayers. And the 3 commissioners want to accommodate him and the public be damned.
“The fraud and lies are only allowed to continue because the people allow it. Either through apathy or ignorance, they still allow it.”
Yup, a horrible idea, its all about killing us with water rate hikes. Las Vegas water restrictions, and enforcing them via huge fines. Making water “Scarce” all the while finding loopholes so they can push the incorporation agenda and build huge shopping malls and and miles upon miles of grass lined soccer fields.
If you control the water, you control the town.
I do like the idea of lawsuits and liens on personal property of anyone pushing this.
P T Barnum said it best “There’s one born every minute”. My question, why are so many of them here.
With all the problems the county council and management have, who in their right mind believe they are in a position to run a utility? I’m less confident today than I was a year ago.
me too! totally agree.
Comments by Comissioner Schinhofen only prove how stupid he really is. We need to get rid of him asap.
Tim is a good friend of mine. I understand his reason for wanting to sell his utilities company. A lot of his reason has to do with his perception of mortality. I also understand both the pros and cons of a county ran utility as a pose to a private utility. Good arguments on both sides. Most true utility companies are public/private hybrids when privately owned. I do prefer the privately owned utility because I believe it offers better over site. Utilities can be easily rate abused by local governments. However Utilities Inc. has taught me that even private utilities can rate abuse just as easily with state commission over site. The only good choice is a free market utility environment where many small utility companies compete for the market. How this would ever happen with such things as gas, water, and power……I don’t know. But that does not mean that it’s impossible to create. Imagine a water system where I get money for the water I draw from my well and put into the system and where I pay for water I get out of the system. With a little engineering and planning it could be done.
I for one say that we DO need to have a govt. owned and operated utility system, if only to promote economic development. If the county or town owned UICN – would Willow Creek golf course still be operational and not the eyesore that it has become – negatively affecting hundreds of property values in the heart of the community. Govt. operated systems have a myriad of options for building infrastructure as opposed to putting the entire cost onto the developer. This alone has caused more businesses to “walk” from the community, not the “regulations” placed on development. Yes, we do need to promote water conservation, balanced with good economic development for our community.