Categorized | Feature, News

Pahrump ballot item recalls Amargosa fight

By Mark Waite

If ballot question No. 2 passes, Pahrump voters will be doing the opposite of what petitioners in Amargosa Valley asked for and got last year.

Ballot question No. 2 would revert the Pahrump town board from an elected board with its own decision making powers to an advisory board, with decision making powers in the hands of the Nye County Commission.

A group of Amargosa Valley residents circulated a petition that was presented to the county commission with 126 signatures in May 2011 — well in excess of the 47 that were required — asking to upgrade their town board from an advisory board to an elected board with the ability to hire employees and pass ordinances. The 47 signatures represented 15 percent of the 307 people who had voted in the last general election.

County commissioners, instead of letting the question go on the ballot during this coming election, decided in July 2011 to enact an ordinance amending the county code giving Amargosa Valley an elected town board.

John Bosta, one of the leaders of the petition drive, referred to issues where the recommendations of the Amargosa Valley advisory board were disregarded by county commissioners. They included a petition opposing the expansion of the Ponderosa Dairy; an ordinance addressing the dumping of bio-solids from Orange County, Calif., at the Funeral Mountain Ranch; planning applications that were approved over their objection; a dispute after Nye County emergency services took over the Amargosa Valley Volunteer Fire Department; and, a hesitancy by county commissioners to appoint two town board members.

So given that experience, you would think Amargosa Valley leaders would suggest Pahrump voters reject the ballot question and preserve the autonomy of the town board, right?

Wrong. Two local leaders didn’t express any sympathy for the travails of the Pahrump Town Board.

Bosta said the main impetus for their petition was the Amargosa Valley town dispute with the county EMS department. That led to the firing of Amargosa Valley Fire Chief Lon Fuller, the resignation of numerous firefighters and after that, the resignations of four of the five Amargosa Valley town board members concerned over the town’s liability.

The first ordinance passed by the newly empowered Amargosa Valley Town Board was the creation of its own town fire department.

“When we went to the county and brought up items, the county didn’t agree with what we wanted,” Bosta said. “We decided to form the elected town board form of government so that we would have some power. Now the problem that you have in Pahrump is they have had a town elected board for years but that elected board has got to the point that they no longer serve their constituents. They’re going now and doing what they want to do as a group of five.”

“If I were able to vote, I would vote to change it to an advisory board. When you serve the public as an elected official I think you should listen to your constituents,” he said.

Bosta said financially the Pahrump Town Board used reserve funds and tax increases to balance its budget.

Amargosa Valley Town Board Chairman Joe DeLee said since they became a newly empowered town board Nye County has gone through a major administrative change, removing EMS Director Brent Jones and County Manager Rick Osborne, who were major sources of friction.

“That was the biggest reason why we decided to try to get into the elected status because of county administration that existed not that long ago. If it hadn’t have been for Brent Jones and Rick Osborne and the way they dealt with our town clerk and our fire department and us in general, we probably wouldn’t have tried to become an elected town board,” DeLee said.

But DeLee sides with the argument for passage of the ballot question that there is too much taxpayer money in Pahrump spent on redundant services. He offered some advice from over the hill, down the Bob Ruud Highway.

“If the Pahrump town board were to become a little fiscally tighter, maybe not quite so antagonistic toward the public, which I’ve heard some of their board members are, that they wouldn’t be in the position they’re in,” he said.

DeLee said when he took office five years ago he instituted public comment at the start and end of board meetings to get input before making policy, the same thing the Pahrump Town Board is being criticized for today. Previously the Amargosa Valley Town Board only received public comment at the end of the meeting.

When the county commission decided to give Amargosa Valley town board the elected form of government in July 2011, County Commissioner Joni Eastley questioned the town board’s financial ability to govern itself. Amargosa Valley is already at the maximum property tax cap of $3.64 per $100 of valuation and has very little commercial business.

DeLee said Amargosa Valley was able to save part of its town budget this year as he himself sat in as volunteer town clerk until the recent hiring of Mike Cottingam. Volunteers filled in after Larry Levy left as the town fire chief.

But Bosta said 92 percent of Amargosa Valley is public land and the town doesn’t receive any share of the Payment In Lieu of Taxes PILT given to Nye County by the federal government. Other than that, Bosta and DeLee both applauded the good working relationship they now have with Nye County. Bosta said the county and the town both came up with $75,000 to keep the Amargosa Valley clinic open.

8 Responses


  1. JD says:

    “If the Pahrump town board were to become a little fiscally tighter, maybe not quite so antagonistic toward the public, which I’ve heard some of their board members are, that they wouldn’t be in the position they’re in,” he said.

    This is exactly why I voted to disband the town board. They did it to themselves.

  2. Fern Brack says:

    On the other hand, it probably is hard not to be antagonistic toward some of the public who attend these meetings regularly just to be antagonstic toward the board. I can’t imagine anyone wanting to serve on the town board and have to deal with some of these people.

  3. Hpotter65 says:

    Well Fern, then maybe everyone on the Town Board should just resign right now. If they did, then I wouldn’t have to vote “yes” on Ballot Question 2. The reason why certain people may seem to be antogonistic towards members of the TB is because the people of Pahrump have lost all respect for them. It’s kinda hard to respect a group of people who treat their constituents with disdain. It’s hard to respect someone who behaves like a senile old lady and persistantly hums while people are talking. It’s hard to respect someone who loses a political race and thrashes an office. Those thing aside, it’s really hard to respect a TB who doesn’t listen to the wants and needs of it’s people. The people have spoken, when they’re allowed to, on numerous occasions about how they want this town managed, yet the TB feels they can go ahead and do what they want. Your elected officials, paid or unpaid, are supposed to work FOR the people, not how they see fit. That’s why it may seem the people are being antogonistic. It’s because they’re fed up with the TB!

  4. You Know Who says:

    “…which I’ve heard some of their board members are” This statement here is a good example of low information voters making decisions on “what they’ve heard” from others. The Town Board was elected to represent ALL of the citizens of Pahrump, not just the very vocal minority who want to see this town remain a dusty, old cow town. Those elected to the town board see the need to expand the tax base, to bring in more businesses and industry.
    I just don’t believe getting the BOCC involved in day to day decisions is progress.

  5. OverTheHump says:

    For a leader to be effective, he/she must have the respect of those they lead. The current TB does not have the respect of the community.

    This vote is not so much a vote against the TB concept as it is a vote against the current TB members.

    It’s very akin to “throwing the baby out with the bath water”.

  6. Otis P. Driftwood says:

    This is what I’m afraid of. I’m not happy with THIS TB. However, I do believe in self governance. Our decisions need to be made right here in Pahrump by people in Pahrump. Just because I do not have confidence in the current members of the TB does not mean that I do not have confidence in the TB system of government. This is why we have elections. If we don’t like what they’re doing, we vote out the members of the town board. I believe that we are going to give up our self control in this election. Although 4 of the 5 County Commissioners are from Pahrump, they are going to be making decisions for the entire county. While we constitute the majority (population wise, tax base wise, etc.) of the county, I’m not sure the county commission has our best interest at heart (and I know they don’t think “Pahrump First” – like a responsible TB would do).

  7. Rockhound says:

    Does anyonw know why the TB was created in 1984 in the first place? Did it have anything to do with the upcoming real estate boom in Southern Nevada? Don’t think for a second it was luck. The power for Summerlin was put in about 10 years before they broke ground. That’s all I’ll say on that subject. If the Nye County tax payers are spending moneys we don’t have on 2 agencies who’s duties overlap then there needs to be a re-organization. I hope the elected officials entrusted with our well being are cutting costs where ever they can. We can’t survive any more Shelly Berkley’s. Yes on 2

  8. Rockhound says:

    I once heard a man say “If you want to know what a man is truely made of then give him privelages. Most anyone can be taught skills but what you do with power, position and privelages will show the world what you are really made of.”

Leave a Reply


You must be logged in to post a comment.

phone book 2013