Categorized | News

Richland Estates resident complains about roads

By Mark Waite

John Erbe, a resident in Richland Estates, said the subdivision with 44 single-family homes was intended to be the future of Pahrump back in 2005, with sanitary sewer and water lines that eliminated the need for septic systems and wells.

But Erbe said roads are deteriorated and appealed to county commissioners Tuesday to accept them for maintenance.

“If that fails, that subdivision or any subdivision similar to it, Pahrump fails,” he said.

Erbe said roads in Comstock Park, a subdivision with 678 lots that have been there since 1980, were designated county roads and maintained.

“We find it unthinkable that our recently installed roads, newer than Comstock Park Road, do not come under some jurisdiction responsible for future maintenance,” Erbe said. “It appears that contractors may have taken irresponsible action at the time of the building boom. As I see it there should have been permits required. There should have been surety bonds provided by contractors. What I ask commissioners, where were town inspectors during these boom times?”

Commissioner Joni Eastley said the roads weren’t taken into the county maintained inventory because they weren’t built to standards.

Nye County Public Works Director Dave Fanning said he didn’t give any verbal direction the roads weren’t built correctly. He said the county maintains Harris Farm Road where minor streets feed into the subdivision.

Fanning said roads in the subdivision weren’t offered for dedication by the builder.

“They never entered into an agreement with the county to develop them, so without that agreement you have nothing to enforce. So there’s nothing to go forward with to follow up and approve for a county maintained road,” Fanning said.

Nye County Planner Steve Osborne said normally a subdivision map would be recorded.

“Why would we OK a subdivision map and not have an agreement on the roads?” Commissioner Gary Hollis asked. “We’re going to have to bite the bullet and make this right. These people were sold a bill of goods as far as I’m concerned. They were told this was a perfectly good subdivision.”

Nye County District Attorney Brian Kunzi said a subdivision map was recorded for the property, there was an offer of dedication of the roads as a public right-of-way, which just means the public has a right to use the roads and utilities have easements.

“That does not mean the county has to maintain them,” he said.

Kunzi said the county can accept the roads but will be responsible for maintaining the roads and bringing them up to code.

Eastley said commissioners are supportive of the Richland Estates residents, but also have laws on the books to protect taxpayers.

“This is not a simple maintenance issue. I want to make sure everybody understands that. I would like nothing more than to have all the money available to fix this problem in Richland Estates. This is an area of subsidence and poor soils. I don’t know if anything can be done, short of tearing up all those roads and hauling the materials necessary and doing the compaction necessary and then rebuilding them,” Eastley said.

Fanning said the builder hired Nevada GeoTech to do a soils report.

“Do we actually need to get restrictions of builders? I think it would be a good thing to bring forward,” he said.

Eastley wanted Kunzi to look into the subdivision agreement. Commissioner Dan Schinhofen wanted to see the costs involved.

Hollis said, “I’ve been on this commission for eight years. This is about the third time Richland Estates has come up, major problems and somewhere down the line we’re going to have to do something to make this right. These citizens have been coming to us and coming to us and we keep saying we’re going to get back with you.”

6 Responses


  1. morgman says:

    So, they want to use MY tax money to fix their roads ??? Gary Hollis is slowly losing my vote.

  2. William Wallace says:

    $5.00 will get you $10.00 that Hollis received “campaign donations” from residents of Richland Estates to have this fixed at taxpayers expense.

    That area should never have been approved for a subdivision. But during the wild days of the housing bubble, the commissioners never met a housing development they didn’t like.

    Hopefully in a couple weeks Hollis is history as aommissioner.

  3. Laslo Nurst says:

    He’s not in my district so I can’t vote him out but he should be.

    Hollis is a worthless old curmudgeon.

  4. wheels460 says:

    Why is it we as taxpayers need to pay for things a shoddy developer promised his patrons? I think the 44 homeowners who did NOT do their due diligence should pay to fix their own roads. You get what you pay for comes to mind.

  5. Laslo Nurst says:

    ‘Fanning said the builder hired Nevada GeoTech to do a soils report.’

    Nevada GeoTech should be put out of business.

    We recently had an in ground pool installed and wanted to keep our $$ with Pahrump businesses. Their quote was almost double the quote from the contractors soils engineer.

    The guy at Nevada GeoTech wanted to know what type of soils report they (the Building Department) wanted like I would know, you are supposed to be the professional here Bub.

    The only Pahrump businesses that were used were the ones to deliver sand and type 2, all other contractors came from Las Vegas.

    What I have heard is Nevada GeoTech charges as much as they can until the government or the builders say ‘Uncle’.

    Pahrump is a poor place to find qualified contractors to do a good job.

    In fact the best handymen have been found on Yahoo Groups, probably unlicensed but I don’t give a **** as long as the do a good job.

  6. You Know Who says:

    As I recall, Samson Yao signed off on the roads without any kind of inspection from Building and Safety. These people have been having problems with these roads for years and keep getting the runaround. The best thing to do is for the county to redo the roads and have the property owners share in the cost, either now or when the properties are sold. Either way, the roads will have to be fixed or there will be problems. If the property owners all get together and sue the county, even if they lose, it will cost the county more than if they just went in and fixed them. They don’t need to be fully asphalted, chip seal will suffice, as long as they aren’t caving in.

Leave a Reply


You must be logged in to post a comment.

phone book 2013