Categorized | Feature, News

VEA refutes water heater claims

By Mark Waite

Valley Electric Association customers, roughly 17,000 of them, received letters this week assuring them the VEA solar hot water heater program was safe and built to code.

The letters appear to put the Pahrump Valley Times in hot water for printing comments by a former county official objecting to Nye County passing a resolution waiving the usual inspection and permits required to install each unit.

Valley Electric has installed more than 650 of the solar hot water heaters. The VEA program saves members from having to buy the solar hot water heater systems outright themselves, customers then pay off the monthly installments over 15 years with savings on their electric bill.

VEA states it has complied with all applicable laws, code provisions and ordinances on the solar hot water heater program. It states the co-op met or exceeded all local, state and federal safety guidelines.

The letter goes on to state all installations are inspected by the State of Nevada Manufactured Housing Division, the Nye County Building and Safety Department or the general contractor. It adds the general contractor and plumbing subcontractor are both licensed and certified. VEA partnered with Great Basin College and Rheem Manufacturing to develop a training program for installers.

Pahrump Senior Building Inspector Brent Steed said the Manufactured Housing Division would inspect solar hot water heaters in mobile homes. But when asked how many he personally inspected, Steed said, “we have inspected very few. They do their own.”

General contractor Tom Laskowski provides information to the county building and safety department on the inspections, Steed said.

“The ones that we’ve looked at in this program have all met code,” Steed said.

Houses built before a certain date do not require Pahrump Building and Safety to inspect the installations, he said.

“In October of ’98, we took out permits for buildings at that time. Anything before then is not required to have a permit and most of these structures are going into buildings that were built before then,” Steed said.

VEA officials and Nye County Planning locked horns in a confrontational meeting in October 2009 over a notification each unit would have to be inspected and a permit fee paid. Steed said his company, Charles Abbott and Associates, reduced the price for each permit and inspection from $650 to $425, although if only a hot water heater was replaced the fee would be only $75.

Dick Johnson, former Nye County director of building safety and code compliance, said the county commission passed a resolution allowing a streamlined inspection, reporting and a self-certification process, however an ordinance was needed to change the building code. While the county commission could pass an ordinance to make the change, Johnson said that would put Pahrump out of a standardized building code used in Las Vegas, Boulder City, Henderson and Mesquite.

“It’s like allowing the builder that built your home to inspect it,” Johnson said.

The streamlined program also discriminates in favor of one contractor, he said. Anyone wanting to install a solar hot water system outside of the VEA program would have to pay for an inspection and a permit.

“The building code says everybody has to be offered the same opportunity,” Johnson said.

Nye County planners, in conjunction with a grant writing consultant, obtained a $185,700 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant in December 2009 that was supposed to be used to pay for inspections of the solar hot water heaters, Johnson said. That would’ve paid for 437 inspections and permits at $425 apiece. Instead, the money was used by Nye County to retrofit the Marilyn Gallivan building, which houses the planning department and to seek bids for installing a solar, photovoltaic system at the new county administration building on the Calvada Eye.

The VEA letter to its members, signed by Chief Executive Officer Tom Husted, lists Nevada Revised Statue 244.3675 which gives the Board of County Commissioners power to regulate all matters relating to the construction, maintenance and safety of buildings, structures and property within the county.

VEA also cites NRS 278.580, which supports county initiatives to amend code provisions to allow for the installation of systems that promote renewable energy.

NRS 278.580 allows a governing body to amend its building codes to permit “systems which use solar or wind energy to reduce the costs of energy for a structure if such systems and structures are otherwise in compliance with applicable building codes and zoning ordinances.” It allows amendments to the building code for the “recognition of any impediments to the development of systems using solar and wind energy.”

Husted’s letter concludes: “Simply put, VEA is confident that the appropriate measures are in place to protect the safety of all participants in this program.”

When contacted Wednesday, Husted referred to the letter and didn’t want to engage in a discussion in the newspaper.

The hot water heater program drew widespread praise when it was launched in 2009. Actor Ed Begley Jr., star of the Planet Green show “Living With Ed,” praised “this wonderful solar thermal system” during a visit to the VEA Renewable Energy Symposium that year. Begley promoted the low $50 down payment and predicted customers would save more than the $21 monthly installment on their electric bill.

13 Responses


  1. Mac says:

    It’s all about the greenie agenda.

  2. eeko says:

    Another mess we are in thanks to the green agenda. Besides these things are excruciatingly inefficient, and do not heat water well if you dare use more than 4 gallons at one time. I thought about getting one to save money until I found out that they need power to work (you have to plug in one component) and they do not heat the water as well as a simple 40 gallon water tank.

  3. Snidely Whiplash says:

    Hot water heaters? Why does hot water need to be heated?

  4. vwtrike99 says:

    These things work great.

  5. vwtrike99 says:

    Not true, mine works great, it heats 80 gallons all summer long with the main (220 volt) power off all the time. The only thing plugged in is a small pump to circulate the hot transfer fluid. During the winter the 220 volts is turned off most of the day. This thing has SAVED us well over what it cost.

  6. KTYoung says:

    We also have the 80 gallon tank and I wish I could go back in time and not get it. The element has been replaced twice now in less than 1-1/2 years. Sure in the summer time the 220 power is off, but try getting hot water in the winter on a overcast cold day. It’s a complete joke! I don’t know how others can say it has SAVED them well over the cost, because my electric bill didn’t go down at all since installing it!

  7. vwtrike99 says:

    Ours saves us more than the $25/month it costs us. Have had it for well over a year now and NO problems, we have hot water right now (just took a shower) and the 220 hasn’t been on for 2 days. It is over 120 degrees right now up on the roof and 50 degrees outside. I for one keep track of my energy usage daily. This has been the best investment in energy savings we have ever made.
    BTW on overcast days (cold doesn’t matter) we turn the 220 back on. It still saves because it is off most of the time on other days. Some overcast days it still makes hot water.
    Our electric bill is about $30/month LESS than 1 1/2 years ago so the hot water tank essentially was FREE.

  8. eeko says:

    I dont know, I just find it odd that someone would PAY for something that sort of works and sort of does not. Our neighbors have this system, it never has enough hot water for them, or so they say.

    Its one thing if they were giving them out for free, but I would never pay to have a so so system.

    Besides, who needs the aggravation of turning on the 220 power on cloudy days, turning it off on sunny days. No thanks.

    I for one, could care less how much energy I am using as long as I can pay my bill.

  9. vwtrike99 says:

    I for one love to save as much money as I can so I can fill my motorhome’s tank with gas and enjoy life.

    BTW… we love the system no matter what anyone else says, and I think the majority of folks that own them do. And it’s no aggravation, turn a switch on or off. We have so much hot water that there is a mixing valve to mix cold water with the hot water before it comes into the house.

  10. KTYoung says:

    I’m glad that VWtrike99 loves his solar hot water as much as he does. I’m also glad that we all have the right to our own opinions, which doesn’t mean we have to shove our opinions down everyone elses throats. With that said, some love their solar hot water heaters and some do not. Enough said!

  11. You Know Who says:

    The real issue here isn’t whether a solar water heater is worth the money, it’s the method VEA went about getting self inspection and how the County Manager championed the activity. From what I understand, at every meeting with VEA, Rick Osborne was acting as an advocate for VEA and not looking out for the County, the homeowners or other contractors. Osborne pushed for this even after his people told him it would come back to bite him and the County. Now look where Osborne is.
    I had intended to have the system installed in my home until I found no permits would be needed nor would anyone other than the installer inspect the installation. I just couldn’t allow un-permitted work to be done on my home and risk violating the integrity of the rood structure. I asked my insurance agent about it and they told me that if I allowed un-permitted work to be done to my home and that work affected the home in some way, they would not cover the damage.
    Husted sent out his propaganda sheet with a copy of the letter from Osborne and a rambling compilation of excuses. What it comes down to is the BOCC overstepped their authority to allow the installation of these units without any permits and inspections and the County Manager overstepped his authority by advocating for VEA. Osborne has been fired and the BOCC members who approved this should be as well.

  12. truth says:

    We almost bit into this scam also. The ‘educated’ fools from GBC tried to convince us that it was a sound project ant touted the savings and tax incentives which we now know are more of the liberal green agenda. This agenda does nothing but rip off the honest tax payers to pay for failed technology that would have otherwise been paid for by the private sector with taxpayer subsidies. Only the weak support this and the evidence is nothing more than a liberal agenda brought forth by a failed administration and ideology. Keepon paying as any thief loves an easy target.

Leave a Reply


You must be logged in to post a comment.

phone book 2012