65°F
weather icon Clear

Congressmembers try to override their own law

On July 10, President Obama designated three new national monuments, including one in Nevada – Basin and Range.

He took this action under the U.S. Antiquities Act.

This is unusual for a couple of reasons. One is that rarely has the United States protected basins in national monuments or parks. And second, Nevada has received fewer national monument designations than many states.

Previously in Nevada, the Lehman cavern (grandly called “caves”) was designated by President Harding on Jan. 24, 1922. It was incorporated into Great Basin National Park in 1986.

Death Valley National Monument in California and Nevada, designated by President Hoover on Feb. 11, 1933, was also later upgraded to a national park in 1994.

Tule Springs Fossil Beds became a national monument on Dec. 19 of last year.

When Obama acted, Nevada Republicans reacted angrily.

U.S. Rep. Joe Heck: “Yet the president, with the stroke of a pen, has bypassed Congress yet again and ignored any input from Nevadans on this designation.”

U.S. Rep. Mark Amodei: “I guess I missed the Nevada delegation meeting to discuss the second largest conservation withdrawal in the history of the state.”

U.S. Rep. Cresent Hardy: “We need to make sure people have local input instead of someone just coming in with the stroke of a pen in the middle of the night as a political favor for someone.”

U.S. Sen. Dean Heller: “With the stroke of a pen, President Obama has bypassed Congress and unilaterally restricted the use of over 700,000 acres of Nevada’s public land.”

If Nevadans were not consulted, which is far from established – a public meeting with deputy interior secretary Michael Connor was held in Las Vegas in February to discuss protecting public lands in Nevada, including Basin and Range – it is because Congress, not the president, set the law up that way.

If Congress was bypassed, it’s because the law passed by Congress specifically provides for that bypass. Forty-five years ago, scholar Ronald Lee wrote that the Antiquities Act was enacted by Congress in 1906 after efforts by “a whole generation of dedicated effort by scholars, citizens, and members of Congress …This public understanding, achieved only after persistent effort in the face of much ignorance, vandalism and indifference, was a necessary foundation for many subsequent conservation achievements.” The act has been used by several presidents and Congress strengthened its provisions in 1979 by enacting the Archaeological Resources Protection Act.

Title 16, section 431 of the United States Code reads in part that the “President of the United States is authorized, IN HIS DISCRETION, to declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest” (emphasis added).

Congressmembers Heck, Hardy, Amodei and Heller have all sponsored or cosponsored measures to change this law, but in spite of overwhelming GOP majorities have failed to do so.

What is of greater concern is the possibility that a mile-long architecture work of art by Michael Heizer called “City” will be brought under the protection of the national monument. (Contrary to news reports, it is not now part of the national monument.) Los Angeles County Museum of Art director Michael Govan, Conservation Lands Foundation director Brian O’Donnell, and environmental journalist Jon Christensen are among those who have called for Antiquities Act protection for “City” and there is one news report that the work of art will be donated to the U.S. government.

“City” was created in the last four decades with private money and is closed to the public. It may be worthy of protection, but it should not be allowed to piggyback on a national monument to accomplish that. The Antiquities Act is called by that name for a reason. It is used to protect the petroglyphs on Basin and Range and other national monuments. Its purpose is not to protect the modern works of people.

The advocates of “City” need to find another way to do something about the Heizer work. Private sources paid for the creation of “City,” and its protection is now in their hands, not the taxpayers’. If they want the government to take over that job, it should be done with something other than national monument status.

Dennis Myers is an award winning journalist who has reported on Nevada’s capital, government and politics for several decades. He has also served as Nevada’s chief deputy secretary of state.

 

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Lessons learned

This past year has seen a lot of changes and most not for the better. As I sit here thinking it over, here are some of the things I have learned.

TIM BURKE: Possible second mandated shutdown would be disastrous

The recent rapid increase in COVID-19 positives is threatening to close businesses and halt family holiday gatherings temporarily. The post-election decrease in COVID-19 positives that some theorized would take place due to the election did not materialize. The exact opposite has happened.

STEVE SEBELIUS: 2020 election mandate? Compromise

Democrats long hoped for a supermajority in the Nevada Legislature; instead, the mixed election results will force both sides to work together to find consensus to fix vexing problems.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: More division coming up

President “projected” Biden stated that he will unite our country. Well, that’s good because his party spent the last four years dividing us. From the end of the election in 2016, the Democrats have refused to accept the results, but rather spent the last four years calling Trump illegitimate, a fraud, and of course tried to impeach him many times. The one time they actually went through with it, they knew it would fail in the Senate, but to meddle in the next election, they did it anyway, During Obama’s administration, there were many times some Republicans wanted to impeach Obama, but with the Senate being held by Harry Reid, they knew it would only be a show and cause division, so they did not.

As Mental Health Comes out of the Shadows, So Should Insurance Coverage to Increase Access to Care

Anyone who has ever tried to navigate the crazy task of selecting an individual health insurance policy knows the fundamental problem is figuring out exactly what you’re buying. Then, traversing the dizzying maze of HMOs, doctors, hospitals, co-pays, deductibles, allowable procedures, and coverage eligibility only increases the frustration.

TIM BURKE:

The chaos surrounding the presidential election bears a semblance to the “hurry-up” offense in the NFL to avoid changing the outcome of a play.