weather icon Clear

Dennis Myers: Why do politicians treat pot smokers as pariahs?

During alcohol prohibition in the United States, there were a variety of ways people could legally drink. There were exceptions for medical reasons, religion loopholes, and others.

It was also legal to drink in one’s own home. People could not BUY booze, but they could drink it in their residences. This made a certain sense in 1919, when alcohol prohibition took effect and a lot of people had unused supplies of alcohol in their homes.

In November 1918, Nevada Attorney General George Thatcher issued a legal opinion saying that if someone stored a supply of alcoholic beverages in his or her home before alcohol prohibition took effect, possession of the stored alcohol would be legal after prohibition kicked in.

But as the years passed it became more and more difficult to make a case that these supplies had not yet been exhausted. Booze had a way of materializing inside homes without benefit of purchase.

There have long been reports that the cocktail party was invented specifically because drinking at home was still legal. This may not be so. As early as April 1917, before prohibition was enacted, a St. Louis social leader named Clara Bell Walsh was reported by a local newspaper to have held a mixed drink party in her home. On the other hand, it may be so.

While 1917 was before prohibition, it was wartime and there was a certain social stigma against drinking because the brewing process used up grain that could be used to feed our fighting men overseas, or so the tale went. Take your pick. Either way, if the Walsh party was first, 2017 would be the centennial year of the cocktail party.

If you’re wondering why I’m wandering down this memory lane, it’s because a legislative lawyer last week issued an opinion saying that nothing is stopping local governments in Nevada from allowing smoking lounges for marijuana from opening.

At the moment, marijuana smokers are being treated the way drinkers were treated during prohibition—they could do it at home and not otherwise. Which raises the question, why? Times have changed and the public has spoken.

Marijuana has long made public officials kind of crazy. Conditioned to accept the mythology of marijuana, they want the revenue from this harmless and even beneficial plant (President Nixon’s marijuana commission reported that marijuana tends “to neutralize criminal behavior and to militate against the commission of aggressive acts”), but they are reluctant to cast any votes that might make them look soft on pot, even with the political cover of a public vote endorsing legal marijuana.

Gov. Sandoval immediately responded to the legislative opinion by opposing any wider location for pot smoking than the home. “I did not support [lounges at the 2016 Legislature],” Sandoval told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “I don’t support them now. … I think that this might invite more [federal] scrutiny with regard to the sale of recreational marijuana.”

Nevada voters have made it pretty plain that they are willing to face down the feds on this issue and they likely expect their governor to do the same. Nevada has tied the feds up in knots for 40 years or so on the proposed dump for high-level nuclear wastes at Yucca Mountain, and it has both science and state law on its side in the case of marijuana. Why can’t Nevada, joined by other states, do the same thing on marijuana?

It is true that at the moment, the local governments have only the opinion by legislative counsel Brenda Erdoes to go on, and while she is a top-notch attorney, the legislative counsel is not the kind of official anyone would want to hang an ordinance on. There is a long history of legislative counsel opinions being written to accommodate legislators. Nor is Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt, who has in the past shown his willingness to ignore the voters’ instructions in ballot measures, a reliable source.

So local governments ought to turn to their own counsel, district attorneys and city attorneys, for legal readings before enacting broader marijuana smoking rules. And the next Legislature should look at taking the wraps off in 2019.

Dennis Myers is an award-winning journalist who has reported on Nevada’s capital, government and politics for several decades. He has also served as Nevada’s chief deputy secretary of state.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Bill of Rights?

Back in January when the “novel coronavirus” was finally making the news, after the debacle of impeachment was over, I was very interested as I watched the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) shut down a city with 35 million residents. My first reaction was, “This could never happen in America as we have a Bill of Rights.” Boy was I wrong.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Lessons learned

This past year has seen a lot of changes and most not for the better. As I sit here thinking it over, here are some of the things I have learned.

TIM BURKE: Possible second mandated shutdown would be disastrous

The recent rapid increase in COVID-19 positives is threatening to close businesses and halt family holiday gatherings temporarily. The post-election decrease in COVID-19 positives that some theorized would take place due to the election did not materialize. The exact opposite has happened.

STEVE SEBELIUS: 2020 election mandate? Compromise

Democrats long hoped for a supermajority in the Nevada Legislature; instead, the mixed election results will force both sides to work together to find consensus to fix vexing problems.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: More division coming up

President “projected” Biden stated that he will unite our country. Well, that’s good because his party spent the last four years dividing us. From the end of the election in 2016, the Democrats have refused to accept the results, but rather spent the last four years calling Trump illegitimate, a fraud, and of course tried to impeach him many times. The one time they actually went through with it, they knew it would fail in the Senate, but to meddle in the next election, they did it anyway, During Obama’s administration, there were many times some Republicans wanted to impeach Obama, but with the Senate being held by Harry Reid, they knew it would only be a show and cause division, so they did not.

As Mental Health Comes out of the Shadows, So Should Insurance Coverage to Increase Access to Care

Anyone who has ever tried to navigate the crazy task of selecting an individual health insurance policy knows the fundamental problem is figuring out exactly what you’re buying. Then, traversing the dizzying maze of HMOs, doctors, hospitals, co-pays, deductibles, allowable procedures, and coverage eligibility only increases the frustration.