weather icon Partly Cloudy

Jim Hartman: Jeff Sessions admirable as attorney general

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has a real enemies list. Included on the list: the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, Fox News Host Sean Hannity and conservative funders Charles and David Koch.

And that’s just some of the Republicans and conservatives. And there are others: the marijuana lobby, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, Gov. Jerry Brown and Sen. Kamala Harris of California. They’re Democrats and liberals.

Yet Sessions’ biggest critic in Washington has been President Donald Trump. In July 2017 Trump took to Twitter and made public comments demeaning and ridiculing the attorney general. The “twitter storm” was the result of Sessions’ announced intention to recuse himself from the investigation of the Trump campaign. But Sessions was only following “the rule of law.”

Justice Department rules dictate that no Justice official “shall participate” in an investigation “if he has a personal or political relationship with … any person or organization substantially involved … that is the subject of the investigation”.

Rudy Giuliani, of President Trump’s legal team, renewed attacks on Sessions in May 2018, calling for him to order the Mueller investigation over. Having already recused himself, Sessions could not legally order the investigation shut down.

The “rule of law” also animated Sessions’ decision to file suit against the State of California “Sanctuary State” law on immigration. Senate Bill 54 prohibits police and sheriff’s officials from cooperating with ICE agents unless they are presented with a federal warrant or criminal removal order. By largely barring the corralling of illegal immigrants upon their release from jail, SB 54 puts immigration agents and local law enforcement in danger.

The legal basis for the challenge to the California law is the 2012 Supreme Court ruling (United States v. Arizona) where the court held federal immigration laws “preempt” state laws under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. The Republican Arizona Legislature’s SB 1070 to “enhance” immigration enforcement was struck down as usurping the federal government’s authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement.

Sessions has been clear again about the “rule of law” on the subject of marijuana.

Cannabis was reaffirmed in August 2016 as a federal Controlled Substances Act Schedule 1 “dangerous drug” by President Barack Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services after an exhaustive review of the relevant medical and scientific evidence. It is also “settled law” by the Supreme Court in 2005 (Gonzales v. Raich) that the federal Controlled Substances Act under the Commerce Clause preempts state laws allowing marijuana use.

With state initiatives purporting to “legalize” marijuana, the Obama administration avoided the conflict by issuing the “Cole Memorandum” promising federal law would not be enforced.

Sessions has withdrawn the Cole Memo.

“Federal law is not abrogated if a state changes its law,” Sessions says. “The attorney general is not able to withdraw federal laws. I can’t direct our people not to enforce the law and won’t do so.” Only an act of Congress can change federal law on marijuana.

Despite the controversies, Sessions has been anything but weak. At the Justice Department, he’s reversed law enforcement policy.

He replaced Obama Attorney General Eric Holder’s tough-on-police, easy-on-sentencing approach with strong support for cops and tough sentencing. Sessions regularly speaks to police and law enforcement groups.

“Sessions is almost certainly the single most effective implementer of Trump’s vision in the entire administration,” David Cole of the American Civil Liberties Union has written. Cole disagrees with those policies.

Sessions’ courage in upholding the “rule of law” in a hostile environment makes the attorney general both remarkable and admirable.

Jim Hartman is an attorney residing in Genoa, Nevada.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Special session fiasco part 2

During this current “special session”, our Democrat-controlled Legislature has prioritized police “reforms” and seem to have forgotten that we are in, what they call, “a health emergency”. While Nevada does have some bad officers, from the vast majority of police in our state, we have not seen racism as a driving issue. Still our state Democratic leaders think that getting on the record with specious “reforms” is a priority, so that their other Democratic friends feel good.

TIM BURKE: Nevada Democrats force November mail-in ballot

The act of physically going to a polling location and casting my vote in-person has always given me a feeling of satisfaction that I am participating in the election process.

THOMAS KNAPP: Afghanistan Bounties: Pot, Meet Kettle (and Turn Off the Stove!)

“These are anarchists, these are not protesters,” President Donald Trump said on July 20th, defending his decision to unleash Department of Homeland Security hooligans on anti-police-violence demonstrators in Portland. Anarchist-bashing — referring to “radical-left anarchists” in Minneapolis, “ugly anarchists” in Seattle, etc. — has become a consistent Trump campaign theme since May.

CHUCK BAKER: Land, Land, but not an inch to spare

“Don’t Fence Me In” was a popular song in the 1940s. Some might say it could be today’s theme song for Nellis AFB. Between all the land held in Nevada by the local air base and the Bureau of Land Management, it appears that control over boundaries and borders will be with Silver State entities for quite some time. And not just in the south.

TIM BURKE: First Amendment protects free speech, not violence

In the rural counties of Nevada, it is not uncommon to have residents assemble and express their conservative viewpoints. Here in Pahrump, during patriotic holidays like the Fourth of July, you might find someone standing along the main roadways waving an American flag to show their support for this country. It is also common to see American flags attached to residents’ cars and trucks around town. These residents are exercising their First Amendment rights.