34°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Federal government wastes billions on empty offices

“Office Space” may be a comedy classic, but the government’s version is no laughing matter.

Last month, the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report on how federal agencies use — or don’t use — their headquarters. It examined 24 agencies, including the departments of Justice, Education and Transportation.

It found that 17 of the 24 agency headquarters buildings “were at 25 percent capacity or less in the first three months of 2023.” Among the bottom quartile of agencies, the usage was a mere 9 percent. Even among the agencies that used their headquarters’ space the most, none topped 50 percent occupancy.

This is an issue with a large footprint. The federal government owns more than 460 million square feet of office space. Maintaining it costs taxpayers billions every year. It’s wasteful to have so much unused space.

One might assume this is a new problem. Perhaps the federal government has been slow to adjust to remote work and the bureaucracy just hasn’t had time to recalculate how much space is needed. Undoubtedly, that’s a factor, but it’s not the underlying one.

“Even before the pandemic shifted the balance between in-office and remote work, federal agencies struggled to identify and let go of unneeded space,” the GAO noted. “Operating unused space has unnecessary financial and environmental costs — one reason federal property management has been on our High Risk List since 2003.”

Two decades of mismanagement isn’t just a problem. It’s a pattern — and it’s not surprising. If you’re running a federal agency, accumulating office space is a sign of prestige. It reflects the importance of your agency and implies that the work you’re doing is important. Just look at the size of that office building.

Largess in the private sector happens, too, but economic downturns and competitive pressures act as self-correcting mechanisms. Private-sector companies have an incentive — the profit motive — to use only what is necessary and scale back when needed.

That doesn’t happen in government. Cutting back on office space may mean a smaller agency budget. And because most government bureaucracies rarely experience actual budget cuts — and can’t go bankrupt thanks to a steady stream of other people’s money — downsizing doesn’t happen.

The GAO recommends that agencies develop new benchmarks for measuring building use. Expect those agencies to agree with that suggestion and then try to ignore it. After all, it’s only taxpayer money. Congress should monitor progress and demand that federal agencies adopt a more efficient approach to office space.

This commentary initially appeared in the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

It’s time to address the inequalities in our nation, not point fingers over who is patriot or not. We’re all Americans first and foremost.

Letters to the Editor

After reading the letter from a “moderate Republican”, with a severe case of TDS,

BOVEE — Election results: What does it all mean?

First, something it doesn’t mean: the Nov. 4 election is not a wholesale rejection of Trump and his policy.

Letters to the Editor

Government shutdowns are becoming almost like ‘political holidays’ for so many in government.

Letters to the Editor

As a moderate Republican I am just shaking my head at the mindless automatons we actually call elected officials who have been storming around causing complete chaos on Capitol Hill for two weeks.

Letters to the Editor

Residents of the Autumnwood subdivision have been under what many in the community feel is an attack on their rights by the Nye County commissioners.

Letters to the Editor

Short-term rentals are not a threat to our community. They are an economic lifeline for many retirees, working families, and property owners like myself.

Letters to the Editor

A town board is just that, a town board, no enforcement or regulatory authority.

Letters to the Editor

If Dr. Waters wants to bring it back, he should list positive things that were in fact done and propose changes for the future – not make an argument based on a hypothetical.