weather icon Clear

Centrist media does public no service

Over the years during debates about whether the press is liberal or conservative, I’ve always maintained that the question is irrelevant because neither answer is correct. The press is establishment, oriented to centrism and authority, whoever happens to be holding office.

In October 2006, Britain’s Lancet – one of the world’s oldest and best medical journals – reported on its findings about civilian casualties in Iraq.

It found there had been 654,965 civilian deaths related to the war, which was about 2.5 percent of the population.

This was in line with an earlier survey it had performed in 2004 and was higher than U.S. government estimates.

George W. Bush was told about the survey and he said, “Six-hundred thousand or whatever they guessed at is just – it’s not credible.”

“Whatever they guessed at”? Lancet researchers, often in dangerous situations, spoke to more than 1,850 families in numerous household clusters in that unfortunate nation, 12,800 people in all.

This methodology was far superior to other sources, such as Iraq Body Count, which (believe it or not) relied on media reports. And the Lancet survey was peer-reviewed, which was true of only one of a dozen or so other similar surveys. Yet the press went along with Bush, thereafter usually quoting other, lower estimates than Lancet. Authority had triumphed over reliability.

In the late 1990s, U.S. leaders were pleased that a new news entity had been launched by the reformer Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa of Qatar.

Named Al Jazeera (Island) and carried by satellite to 35 million people in the region, it provided an independent news source in the Middle East, to the consternation of other Arab leaders, who to this day want it shut down (in June Egypt imprisoned two Al Jazeera journalists for terms of seven and ten years and in March three Arab nations pulled their ambassadors out of Qatar).

Al Jazeera actually provided (and still provides) better coverage of innumerable issues than the U.S. press, including of some events inside the United States. U.S. officials and journalists found it indispensable. In May 2001 in the United States, Ed Bradley profiled Al Jazeera on 60 minutes, describing “an information revolution that allows Al-Jazeera to bypass government censors and broadcast directly into people’s homes throughout the Arab world…Every single Arab country has complained to Qatar about Al-Jazeera…

But what makes Al-Jazeera must-see TV for Arabs is its emphasis on news, investigative reports and documentaries, plus a wide range of talk shows that discuss subjects that, in most Arab media, are strictly taboo.”

Then on September 11 that year, the World Trade Center and Pentagon tragedies occurred. In subsequent months and years, Al Jazeera maintained its stance of not serving as a voice for any government. The Bush administration was offended that Al Jazeera did not parrot its views on the Afghan and Iraq wars and pressured the government of Qatar to do something it. A British newspaper reported that in 2004 Bush considered bombing Al Jazeera’s operation in Doha.

The U.S. press during that period responded to the Bush stance and began de-emphasizing Al Jazeera information in its reports. Authority had spoken.

On July 31, 2012, Nevada’s U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic floor leader, claimed without evidence that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney paid no income taxes for ten years.

But Reid conceded his claim might not be true. Two gullible reporters posted the rumor anyway, and it created a firestorm.

The fact-checking site Politifact, noting that Reid refused to substantiate the claim, adjudged it false. Reid responded not by substantiating the claim but by attacking Politifact.

An authority had spoken and some journalists were critical of Politifact instead of Reid.

For instance, Time magazine and the Washington Monthly faulted Politifact for calling Reid on his rumor-mongering. Journalism had heard its master’s voice.

Lancet, Al Jazeera, and Politifact are valued parts of the journalism community. They provide terrific service to the public.

When major media entities can be demonized and damaged by politicians and even journalists buy into it, thus undercutting the usefulness of those entities, it says something about journalism, not politics.

Dennis Myers is an award winning journalist who has reported on Nevada’s capital, government and politics for several decades. He has also served as Nevada’s chief deputy secretary of state.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
Letters to the Editor

President earning place in history, but not as he wanted

VICTOR JOECKS: The myth of Cortez Masto the moderate

If Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto has a moderate bone in her body, now would be an opportune time to demonstrate it.

Letters to the Editor

Just because news show is popular doesn’t make it an honest program

Letters to the Editor

Democracy allows us to express our political views

VICTOR JOECKS: Media yawns as delta wave hits blue states

If the national mainstream media wants to blame governors for surging coronavirus cases, there are a number of blue states that deserve its attention.

STEVE SEBELIUS: Laxalt’s “Star Wars” analogy is a stretch

Former Attorney General Adam Laxalt compared his quest to be elected to the Senate to the cause of the Rebels from “Star Wars,” which is most definitely is not.

THOMAS KNAPP: 1984 alive in 2021: We’ve taken on doing Big Brother’s job for him

George Orwell’s classic dystopia “1984” describes a future (as of 1949, the year of its publication) in which a totalitarian state attempts to control both present and future by modifying the past. The novel’s protagonist, Winston Smith, works at the Ministry of Truth, “rectifying” past news accounts:

Letters to the Editor

Individual rights eroding without notice by some