44°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

EDITORIAL: The plan to cut the federal government down to size

Donald Trump lost his attorney general nominee last week as Matt Gaetz withdrew his name from consideration amid an ethics probe and doubts about his confirmation odds. But the news wasn’t all bad for the president-elect, as his effort to force savings and efficiency on the federal leviathan came into clearer focus.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy outlined their plans to lead Mr. Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency. The entrepreneurs take their task seriously and are intent on delivering results.

“We are entrepreneurs, not politicians,” they wrote. “We will serve as outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees. Unlike government commissions or advisory committees, we won’t just write reports or cut ribbons. We will cut costs.” They don’t expect to flinch: “We are prepared for the onslaught from entrenched interests in Washington. We expect to prevail.”

Their recipe for progress is surprisingly simple and pragmatic. It hinges on two U.S. Supreme Court cases in which the justices finally put the brakes on an unaccountable administrative state, which for decades has served as a quasi-legislative force inside the executive branch. In West Virginia v. EPA (2022), the court held that Congress must explicitly authorize regulations involving major policy questions. This year, in Loper Bright v. Raimondo, the justices ruled that the courts no longer must defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of their own regulatory power.

Taken together, Mr. Musk and Mr. Ramaswamy argue that there are “thousands” of rules that “exceed the authority Congress has granted under the law.” They and their team plan to identify such rules and forward them to Mr. Trump to “initiate the process of review and rescission” through executive order. This, they maintain, “will be correcting the executive overreach of thousands of regulations promulgated by administrative fiat that were never authorized by Congress.”

Stuffing bloated bureaucracies back behind their constitutional boundaries will save billions for taxpayers, as fewer workers will be necessary to staff agencies that have had their authority “properly limited.” But the pair will also target spending that is “unauthorized by Congress or being used in ways that Congress never intended.” That includes handouts to special interests and $1.5 billion spent on “grants to international organizations.”

Mr. Musk and Mr. Ramaswamy vow to meet their cost-cutting goals without touching entitlement programs by focusing on the “sheer magnitude of waste, fraud and abuse” in the federal spending.

Past efforts to pare back the corpulent Washington bureaucracy have crashed and burned. But Mr. Musk and Mr. Ramaswamy have a track record of problem-solving, innovation and entrepreneurship. Something feels different this time.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

I am writing to thank the person who stole the clothing rack secured by the front door of our store.

Letters to the Editor

Vern Jewett’s recent letter espousing solar farms has me scratching my head for so many reasons.

Investing in Health Access for Nevada’s Rural Communities

Rural living means we face unique challenges that urban areas often don’t, especially when it comes to accessing essential services like health care.

Letters to the Editor

Why is it that those with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) will never take the time to research the other side of an issue before opening mouth and inserting foot?

Letters to the Editor

In Wednesday’s Letters to the Editor, two letters were inadvertently combined. Our apologies to both writers. Here they are in their correct form.

A tribute to a great town and travel buddy

Just like towns, our lives are boom and bust, and this holiday season I’m just thankful for the time that we had together.

Letters to the Editor

Dr. Waters does not speak for the majority of military veterans when he disparages Donald Trump.

Letters to the Editor

It seems the narrative is, “if you can afford solar power you must be rich, so you can pay more too.”