weather icon Overcast

Early Michael Brown coverage absolutely shameful, irresponsible

I have to admit, I don’t know what happened in Ferguson, Missouri, between Michael Brown and police officer Darren Wilson.

Then again, neither did any of the columnists who helped fan the flames of racial tensions immediately after Brown’s death.

Much of the early media spin — not to mention that of professional race hustlers like Al Sharpton — that helped spark daily unrest was that Brown was innocently walking down the street, minding his own business, going to Grandma’s house — just like Little Red Riding Hood — when the Big Bad Cop Wolf shot him dead for no reason other than he was black.

For example, New Yorker columnist Amy Davidson wrote that Brown “was described as gentle, committed to sports and to his friends, working hard to make up classes when he fell behind, and excited about starting college.”

He was also described as a “child” — despite being an 18-year-old adult who stood at 6-foot-2 and reportedly weighed in at some 290 pounds.

Only later — well after the riots, violence and looting began — did we learn that Brown was “no angel” and may have had a juvenile arrest record.

Only later, as the New York Times reported, did we learn that Brown “was caught on a security camera stealing a box of cigars, pushing the clerk of a convenience store into a display case.”

Initial reports also claimed, with metaphysical certitude, that an “unarmed” Brown had his hands above his head and was backing away when he was shot.

Only later — well after the riots, violence and looting began — did we learn that Brown might have assaulted the officer in an altercation.

Again, we don’t yet know what really happened. But that didn’t stop people from irresponsibly jumping to conclusions and painting Brown as a saint and lionizing him as a martyr who was the victim of an “execution-style murder” at the hands of a rogue, racist cop.

That Brown robbed that convenience store just prior to his altercation with Wilson may have had nothing whatsoever to do with how the incident played out. Then again, it might have. No one knows for sure. And we should stop pretending we do until ALL of the facts come out.

That said, I’m sorry but I just have a hard time buying the story that a “gentle” black “child” was just innocently walking down the street when a white police officer randomly decided to gun him down in broad daylight for no reason whatsoever.

But let’s say it’s true. I still don’t understand how the appropriate response is to break out the windows of a local retail store and steal a flat-screen color HDTV. Would someone please explain that one to me?

Chuck Muth is president of Citizen Outreach, a conservative grassroots advocacy organization. He can be reached at www.MuthsTruths.com.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
DAN SCHINHOFEN: The law of unintended consequences

Why aren’t we demanding that Emperor Sisolak hand back his power to our elected Representatives? Why haven’t our Representatives convened and taken back their authority to govern?

Letters to the Editor

Do we label it ‘propaganda,’ or is it ‘public relations’?


It recently struck me how little I have traveled or even gone out for an evening during the last 12 months. Usually, this time of year, I would be attending a trade show in California, planning a couple of weekend getaway trips, and dreaming of going to Europe for a week.

Letters to the Editor

Out-of-town reader supportive of Pahrump after reading local news

Letters to the Editor

Many double standards prevail in political circles

TIM BURKE: First Amendment rights in danger on major social media platforms

Freedom of expression is one of our most cherished rights. Over the weekend, the conservative social media platform, Parler, headquartered in Henderson, Nevada, was shut down when Amazon turned off the web services that hosted the platform.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Open Letter to Nevada House Delegation

To the honorable Representatives of our State. I am taking a moment to write and plead with you to act in the best interest of America rather than your political party. I heard Speaker Pelosi say, on 60 minutes, that one reason to impeach President Trump was so that he could never run again. While your Party has been talking about election interference since 2016 and spent 40 million dollars of our money to investigate “Russian Collusion”, no collusion was found.

Letters to the Editor

Resident disputes timing of trash disposal rate increase

DEBRA J. SAUNDERS: How to start a civil war

President Donald Trump’s supporters didn’t think through what would have happened if they’d succeeded in overturning the legitimate 2020 election.