56°F
weather icon Cloudy

EDITORIAL: Federal government wastes billions on empty offices

“Office Space” may be a comedy classic, but the government’s version is no laughing matter.

Last month, the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report on how federal agencies use — or don’t use — their headquarters. It examined 24 agencies, including the departments of Justice, Education and Transportation.

It found that 17 of the 24 agency headquarters buildings “were at 25 percent capacity or less in the first three months of 2023.” Among the bottom quartile of agencies, the usage was a mere 9 percent. Even among the agencies that used their headquarters’ space the most, none topped 50 percent occupancy.

This is an issue with a large footprint. The federal government owns more than 460 million square feet of office space. Maintaining it costs taxpayers billions every year. It’s wasteful to have so much unused space.

One might assume this is a new problem. Perhaps the federal government has been slow to adjust to remote work and the bureaucracy just hasn’t had time to recalculate how much space is needed. Undoubtedly, that’s a factor, but it’s not the underlying one.

“Even before the pandemic shifted the balance between in-office and remote work, federal agencies struggled to identify and let go of unneeded space,” the GAO noted. “Operating unused space has unnecessary financial and environmental costs — one reason federal property management has been on our High Risk List since 2003.”

Two decades of mismanagement isn’t just a problem. It’s a pattern — and it’s not surprising. If you’re running a federal agency, accumulating office space is a sign of prestige. It reflects the importance of your agency and implies that the work you’re doing is important. Just look at the size of that office building.

Largess in the private sector happens, too, but economic downturns and competitive pressures act as self-correcting mechanisms. Private-sector companies have an incentive — the profit motive — to use only what is necessary and scale back when needed.

That doesn’t happen in government. Cutting back on office space may mean a smaller agency budget. And because most government bureaucracies rarely experience actual budget cuts — and can’t go bankrupt thanks to a steady stream of other people’s money — downsizing doesn’t happen.

The GAO recommends that agencies develop new benchmarks for measuring building use. Expect those agencies to agree with that suggestion and then try to ignore it. After all, it’s only taxpayer money. Congress should monitor progress and demand that federal agencies adopt a more efficient approach to office space.

This commentary initially appeared in the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

Vern Jewett’s recent letter espousing solar farms has me scratching my head for so many reasons.

Investing in Health Access for Nevada’s Rural Communities

Rural living means we face unique challenges that urban areas often don’t, especially when it comes to accessing essential services like health care.

Letters to the Editor

Why is it that those with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) will never take the time to research the other side of an issue before opening mouth and inserting foot?

Letters to the Editor

In Wednesday’s Letters to the Editor, two letters were inadvertently combined. Our apologies to both writers. Here they are in their correct form.

A tribute to a great town and travel buddy

Just like towns, our lives are boom and bust, and this holiday season I’m just thankful for the time that we had together.

Letters to the Editor

Dr. Waters does not speak for the majority of military veterans when he disparages Donald Trump.

Letters to the Editor

It seems the narrative is, “if you can afford solar power you must be rich, so you can pay more too.”