51°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

EDITORIAL: The connection between green energy and high power bills

For years, Nevada has put affordable energy on the back burner. Now, ratepayers are getting burned.

The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy recently put out research on energy bills. In Las Vegas, it found that a quarter of low-income households spend 12.6 percent or more of their families’ income on home energy. The median for low-income households is a more manageable 5.5 percent. According to the group, if energy costs more than 10 percent of household income, the energy burden is deemed severe.

In practical terms, that can mean there isn’t enough money to go around. Low-income individuals sometimes must choose between keeping the power on and paying for household necessities. But during Las Vegas summers, air conditioning is a necessity, too.

For middle-income families, high power bills may not be a crisis, but they limit spending on other priorities. As the Review-Journal’s Emerson Drewes recently reported, these high prices are even hurting local charities. That includes Living Grace Homes, which helps young homeless mothers.

This wasn’t the future green-energy that snake oil salesmen promised Nevada. For years, these advocates assured voters and elected officials that green energy mandates would lower prices. A 2019 fact sheet from the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council and Western Resource Advocates, said, “A strong RPS lowers costs.”

RPS stands for renewable portfolio standard. As passed by voters and the Legislature, Nevada has to purchase half its power from renewable sources by 2030. The campaign to enshrine this in the state constitution pledged that it “would save Nevadans money.”

We’re still waiting.

The problem is that solar energy isn’t reliable. The sun sets every night, and people still want to run their air conditioners and use their appliances. Some drivers want to charge their EVs, too. Along with paying for solar, Nevada has to build new natural gas plants to back it up and supplement it.

Solar power isn’t even always available during the day. That’s why NV Energy is building Greenlink, a massive transmission line project. It needs to connect clean energy projects in different parts of the state to improve reliability. That project will cost more than $4 billion. It’s so expensive that it’ll take 70 years or more to pay off.

In June 2004, residential power in Nevada cost 9.66 cents per kilowatt-hour. In June 2014, it cost 12.83 cents per kWh. In June 2024, it was 15.5 cents per kWh.

Not exactly the savings you were promised. To lower power bills, Nevada needs to pare back its green energy mandates.

This commentary initially appeared in the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

I am writing to thank the person who stole the clothing rack secured by the front door of our store.

Letters to the Editor

Vern Jewett’s recent letter espousing solar farms has me scratching my head for so many reasons.

Investing in Health Access for Nevada’s Rural Communities

Rural living means we face unique challenges that urban areas often don’t, especially when it comes to accessing essential services like health care.

Letters to the Editor

Why is it that those with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) will never take the time to research the other side of an issue before opening mouth and inserting foot?

Letters to the Editor

In Wednesday’s Letters to the Editor, two letters were inadvertently combined. Our apologies to both writers. Here they are in their correct form.

A tribute to a great town and travel buddy

Just like towns, our lives are boom and bust, and this holiday season I’m just thankful for the time that we had together.

Letters to the Editor

Dr. Waters does not speak for the majority of military veterans when he disparages Donald Trump.