55°F
weather icon Cloudy

How can Nevada screw up pot legalization; let me count the ways

How can a state that has so successfully handled legal gambling, legal 24/7 consumption of alcohol, and legal prostitution have so fouled up legalizing marijuana?

Make no mistake. The handwriting is on the wall. Government drug warriors have lost the drug war. At least as far as marijuana is concerned. Legal, recreational marijuana is coming – like it or not, one way or the other.

Indeed, a petition to legalize, tax and regulate recreational marijuana like alcohol was will be on the ballot next November because the 2015 Nevada Legislature refused to deal with the issue. It's a long, complicated eight-page initiative.

Problem is, legalizing marijuana is very different from taxing and regulating marijuana. So the proposed initiative is a mess.

For example, there's a "special interest" clause that prohibits a marijuana grower from selling its crops directly to a product manufacturer or retailer. Instead, it may sell its crops "only to persons holding a wholesale dealer license pursuant to Chapter 369 of NRS."

Chapter 369 of NRS means…a liquor wholesaler.

Why in the world should a properly licensed MARIJUANA grower have to sell his product through a LIQUOR "middle man" who is not required to get a marijuana license like everyone else in the food chain?

If the voters themselves are to make the decision and bear the burden of legalizing marijuana, the proper and correct way to do so is through a simple constitutional amendment - absent special interest clauses like that ridiculous liquor wholesale provision.

Borrowing from similar amendments I found that have been floated in Florida and Ohio, a Nevada constitutional amendment might read something like this…

"All people in the State of Nevada of legal voting age and older shall have the right under state laws to possession, use, and cultivation of cannabis. This right shall not be infringed except that the transfer of cannabis by purchase or sale may be regulated as necessary to ensure health and safety. 'Cannabis' in this section is defined as all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis, whether growing or not, and the seeds thereof.

"Cultivators shall neither be permitted to sell their products directly to the public without a retail license, nor shall they be required to sell their products through a wholesaler.

"The provisions of this section are self-executing and severable, and, except where otherwise indicated in the text, shall supersede all conflicting state and local laws, charters and regulations or other provisions of this constitution. The Legislature may pass laws implementing and facilitating the provisions of this section that are not in conflict with its provisions."

If we're going to legalize marijuana – and I understand that many continue to object to such a move – but if we're going to do it, let's do it right.

Chuck Muth is president of CitizenOutreach.com and the publisher of www.NevadaNewsandViews.com. You can reach him at ChuckMuth.com

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

Vern Jewett’s recent letter espousing solar farms has me scratching my head for so many reasons.

Investing in Health Access for Nevada’s Rural Communities

Rural living means we face unique challenges that urban areas often don’t, especially when it comes to accessing essential services like health care.

Letters to the Editor

Why is it that those with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) will never take the time to research the other side of an issue before opening mouth and inserting foot?

Letters to the Editor

In Wednesday’s Letters to the Editor, two letters were inadvertently combined. Our apologies to both writers. Here they are in their correct form.

A tribute to a great town and travel buddy

Just like towns, our lives are boom and bust, and this holiday season I’m just thankful for the time that we had together.

Letters to the Editor

Dr. Waters does not speak for the majority of military veterans when he disparages Donald Trump.

Letters to the Editor

It seems the narrative is, “if you can afford solar power you must be rich, so you can pay more too.”