84°F
weather icon Clear

Jim Hartman: A look at the tax bill’s business bonanza

Apple CEO Tim Cook joined Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval and Reno Mayor Hillary Schieve recently for groundbreaking on a new $4 million shipping and receiving warehouse in downtown Reno.

The ceremony last month came as Apple was announcing plans to hire 20,000 more workers and invest an additional $350 billion in the U.S. economy over the next five years, resulting from the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Apple also announced a $2,500 employee bonus in company stock and that it would pay $38 billion in taxes on repatriated earnings on cash the company held overseas.

Apple was responding to the corporate tax cut from 35 percent to 21 percent contained in the tax bill and a 15.5 percent tax rate on profits earned overseas. Apple was one of an ever-growing list of more than 125 major employers announcing significant tax-cut induced wage increases and employee bonuses.

On the day following the bill’s signing by President Donald Trump, AT&T and Comcast said they would pay a $1,000 bonus to most U.S. employees, more than 300,000 people. Wells Fargo &Co. said it would increase its starting pay to $15 an hour.

Walmart announced bonuses of up to $1,000 for its employees, raising minimum starting wages to $11 an hour from $9. Fiat Chrysler reported relocation of a heavy-duty truck factory from Mexico to Michigan, creating 2,500 American jobs, and awarded $2,000 in bonuses for workers. Verizon, Starbucks, Boeing and Disney are among other corporate names making similar employee pay increase and bonus announcements.

The tax cut for individuals will result in Treasury Department changes to tax withholding rates by Feb. 15. Workers will receive more take-home pay. The U.S. government estimates more than 90 percent of workers will have bigger paychecks under the withholding changes.

Democrats in Congress chose to “resist” the tax bill, without offering an alternative. They linked the legislation to the personal unpopularity of Trump. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called the tax overhaul “the worst bill in the history of the United States Congress.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said it “will be an anchor around the ankles of every Republican.”

The 35 percent corporate tax rate had not changed in 31 years, despite recognition by both Democrats and Republicans that the United States was increasingly uncompetitive with other countries on corporate taxes. Both parties acknowledged that the U.S. had the highest statutory tax rate among the Group of 20 (G20 nations).

Interest in reducing the 35 percent federal corporate tax rate has built over the years. In 2007, Democrat House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel introduced legislation to reduce the top statutory rate to 30.5 percent. In his January 2011 State-of-the-Union address, President Barack Obama urged a major cut in the corporate rate.

In 2012, Obama proposed a top corporate tax of 28 percent and continued that call in each succeeding year of his presidency.

Obama could have made all this happen but refused to negotiate seriously with a GOP Congress. Meanwhile, companies left the U.S. through the device of “corporate inversions” so as to be taxed at lower foreign rates, eroding the U.S. tax base. Democrats made the calculation on the tax bill that the best politics were to “resist Trump.”

Now, no Democrat can share in tax reform’s political dividends.

Democrats are counting on Trump’s erratic personal behavior and his loathing among their base to overcome good economic news. That includes a business revival that includes a 17-year low in unemployment, a 17-year high in business confidence and 3 percent GDP growth.

Still, Republicans should be wary. There is nothing “normal” about Trump’s presidency—his tweets include nonsensical attacks, childlike taunts and untruths.

Whatever the state of the economy, voters in 2018 may still choose to punish “the party of Trump.”

Jim Hartman is an attorney residing in Genoa, Nevada.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Special session fiasco part 2

During this current “special session”, our Democrat-controlled Legislature has prioritized police “reforms” and seem to have forgotten that we are in, what they call, “a health emergency”. While Nevada does have some bad officers, from the vast majority of police in our state, we have not seen racism as a driving issue. Still our state Democratic leaders think that getting on the record with specious “reforms” is a priority, so that their other Democratic friends feel good.

TIM BURKE: Nevada Democrats force November mail-in ballot

The act of physically going to a polling location and casting my vote in-person has always given me a feeling of satisfaction that I am participating in the election process.

THOMAS KNAPP: Afghanistan Bounties: Pot, Meet Kettle (and Turn Off the Stove!)

“These are anarchists, these are not protesters,” President Donald Trump said on July 20th, defending his decision to unleash Department of Homeland Security hooligans on anti-police-violence demonstrators in Portland. Anarchist-bashing — referring to “radical-left anarchists” in Minneapolis, “ugly anarchists” in Seattle, etc. — has become a consistent Trump campaign theme since May.

CHUCK BAKER: Land, Land, but not an inch to spare

“Don’t Fence Me In” was a popular song in the 1940s. Some might say it could be today’s theme song for Nellis AFB. Between all the land held in Nevada by the local air base and the Bureau of Land Management, it appears that control over boundaries and borders will be with Silver State entities for quite some time. And not just in the south.

TIM BURKE: First Amendment protects free speech, not violence

In the rural counties of Nevada, it is not uncommon to have residents assemble and express their conservative viewpoints. Here in Pahrump, during patriotic holidays like the Fourth of July, you might find someone standing along the main roadways waving an American flag to show their support for this country. It is also common to see American flags attached to residents’ cars and trucks around town. These residents are exercising their First Amendment rights.