weather icon Partly Cloudy

Letters to the Editor

Pronounced guilty before the facts are known

In the Old West some used to say, “Let’s get this trial over with so we can get on with the hanging.” Similar thinking seems to be prevalent with many local Republicans. Yes, I am aware that Sandoval and Oscarson campaigned on “no new taxes.” However one of the purposes of a republic (which is what we have) is that the elected representatives, in this case Oscarson and Sandoval, are supposed to have the time and also take the time to scrutinize very important issues and then decide what is best for those being governed. I am certain that they analyzed every aspect of what new taxes would do as opposed to the status quo. They must have had committee reports and countless studies done by experts and undoubtedly looked at our situation from every angle possible.

Our schools are at or near the bottom. A well-qualified teacher in Nevada, making only $50,000 per year, is very likely to leave for California where he may make $80,000. So the argument that “throwing more money won’t fix the problem” is not entirely true.

As a Democrat I don’t like to pay more for goods and services to businesses for added revenue to be passed on to government any more than Republicans. However, and this is the big issue, if the added revenue to government will improve our educational system and also create a modern medical school in Las Vegas, then why not?

I know for a fact that Oscarson agonized over this issue and considered every angle, including his pledge not to raise taxes. In the end he must have decided that his duty to Nevada outweighed his pledge of no new taxes, that what happened to him was not as important as the welfare of Nevada. I want to get the facts before I pronounce sentence. Therefore, I am asking Mr. Oscarson to give us his reasons for the tax increases, and how they will improve the problem, and that his report be published in our local newspapers.

Jim Ferrell

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
TIM BURKE: Supreme Court: it’s OK to lie in political campaign

The mail-in ballot process for this year’s primary has changed how campaigns for office are conducted in this election. The campaigning season is shorter, and there is less advertising by candidates as a consequence.

STEVE SEBELIUS: No fraud, lawbreaking in mail election

Despite tweeted claims by President Donald Trump, Nevada’s mail-in election is completely legal and claims of fraud are speculative and unsupported by evidence.

TIM BURKE: High school using novel approach for graduation

The stay-at-home order has robbed our young adults who graduate high school this year of significant milestones that mark their passage into adulthood.

Ready or not lockdown season is coming to an end

On May 15, city officials declared Atwater, California a “sanctuary city.” Not for undocumented immigrants, but for businesses and churches who choose to ignore governor Gavin Newsom’s COVID-19-related shutdown orders. The city won’t be enforcing the governor’s edicts. Those edicts, mayor Paul Creighton told local businesses, are “between you and the state of California.”

STEVE SEBELIUS: Recalls are hard — and they should be

Recalls of public officials in Nevada are rarely successful, which is the way it should be, since recall proponents are asking voters to undo the results of a legitimate election.