CARSON CITY — The executive director of the Nevada Commission on Ethics alleges Gov. Joe Lombardo committed multiple ethics violations by using his sheriff’s badge and uniform during his governor’s campaign, according to materials the commission released Tuesday.
In a motion before the commission that was included in a 456-page packet of materials, Executive Director Ross Armstrong asked the commission to order Lombardo to pay a civil penalty of about $1.67 million, that a censure be issued and an ethics officer be designated to his office.
Lombardo’s administration and his campaign lawyers did not comment on the filing, but his campaign lawyers in legal papers said Armstrong’s efforts are like “using a sledgehammer to swat a fly.”
A former commissioner resigned from his post in May because of the complaint against Lombardo, saying the commission was tainted by “political interference.”
The ethics commission will hold a public meeting about the complaint case on Tuesday to consider motions in the case.
Using badge during campaign
Armstrong argued Lombardo used governmental time, property or equipment to benefit his personal or pecuniary interests.
During his campaign for governor, Lombardo published photos and advertisements of himself wearing his sheriff’s uniform and badge. When he first made his announcement that he was running for governor on Fox, for example, he wore a Metropolitan Police Department’s sheriff badge pin on his lapel, according to filings dated March 22.
Nevada state law says “a public officer or employee shall not use the public officer’s or employee’s position in government to secure or grant unwarranted privileges, preferences, exemptions or advantages for the public officer …”
Armstrong also argues that Lombardo’s violations were “willful,” in part because he did not self-report or attempt to rectify the violations before or after the complaints were filed.
The commission determined that Lombardo gained financially as a result of the violation, because he was elected governor and now receives the governor’s salary and benefits.
Lombardo took a $30,000 pay cut in salary when he became governor, according to his financial disclosure reports. His governor’s salary is $163,474, according to his 2023 financial disclosure report, while his salary as sheriff was $192,000, according to his 2022 annual financial disclosure statement.
In a motion filed to dismiss the complaint, Lombardo’s attorneys argued that the alleged violations are “relatively inconsequential,” as they are based on a handful of photographs that depict him in his uniform. They argue that no state law prohibits a sheriff’s use of his uniform and badge in campaign materials.
His lawyers also wrote that the executive director threatened impeachment, which they said is “absurd.”
Armstrong, however, wrote that if the commission finds a “single willful violation” against Lombardo, he is required within the ethics law to provide that information to speaker of the Assembly and the majority leader of the Senate.
Lombardo’s attorneys said the commission cannot take the alleged violations that Lombardo made in his capacity as sheriff of Clark County and use them to seek impeachment because the conduct occurred before he was sworn in as governor.
‘Tainted by political interference’
Lombardo’s attorneys are not the only ones saying the executive director has overstepped.
Damian Sheets, a former commissioner who was appointed by former Gov. Steve Sisolak, resigned May 17 because of the case made against Lombardo, according to his resignation letter that was obtained by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
“It is with great sadness that I make this decision, but I can no longer serve on a commission that has strayed from its original purpose and has been tainted by political interference, whether it be a product of internal members’ political views or external influence,” Sheets wrote in the letter.
Sheets felt the commission acted with “bias, prejudice or preference” for “self-initiating” a complaint against Lombardo, he wrote.
The claim that a gubernatorial candidate should be prohibited from showing his law enforcement service to the public was “preposterous,” Sheets wrote.
“It is clear to me that the commission has lost its way and is no longer operating in the best interests of the citizens of Nevada.”
In an interview with the Review-Journal on Wednesday, Armstrong said that over the course of the 2022 election season, the commission investigated a dozen campaign cases of members of all political parties.
The June hearing will determine whether there was a violation, and if so, whether it was willful. If the commission finds a violation, it will assign a penalty.
If the commission finds a nonwillful violation, penalties could include training, an apology, an admonishment, a payback of a financial benefit or conditions on future behavior. If commissioners find a willful violation, there could be civil penalties or a petition for removal.