weather icon Clear

One Nevada drowning evolves into three

On Sept. 9, I received an email news release from what appeared to be the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The subject line read, “Nevada Child Drownings Highest in U.S. Per Capita for August.”

As I read closer, I realized the release was not from the Commission, but from Finn Partners, a D.C. public relations firm that apparently handles the Commission’s publicity.

That, of course, made me more cautious. The release read in part, “CPSC compared total media-reported pool and spa drownings for August for children less than 15 with the most recent and most comparable census data by state, for children less than 18. They found that Nevada child drowning numbers spiked in August with 4.52 drownings per million children…”

Immediately, given the fact that they were reporting only a single month’s figures, I wanted more information. If they were sending these releases out each month, they might easily be unrepresentative simply because the time sample was so small. Plus, I didn’t know what to make of the 4.52 figure in a state with 2.8 million people. Why not just supply the actual figure? So I wrote back to Drew Lovejoy, who signed the message accompanying the Commission’s release: “I assume there were not 4.52 actual drownings. Can you tell me the number there were…?”

A few minutes later I received this message in reply: “Three drownings took place this past August – one fatal and two nonfatal. … The two nonfatal drownings took place on August 5 and 13.”

Now I REALLY didn’t know what to make of this. I had never heard of a nonfatal drowning. I was reminded of Byron’s “melancholy merriment” or Donne’s “beggarly riches.”

So I did a little research and then wrote back to the commission again: “I just checked the definition of drown in seven dictionaries, including the OED, and also checked to see how it is defined in Nevada Revised Statutes. They all define a drowning as a death by submersion. That would make a nonfatal drowning a contradiction in terms. What is a nonfatal drowning?”

Mr. Lovejoy replied, “CPSC uses the World Health Organization definition of drowning, which is: Drowning is the process of experiencing respiratory impairment from submersion/immersion in liquid; outcomes are classified as ‘death,’ ‘morbidity’ and ‘no

morbidity.’ We use the terms ‘fatal’ and ‘nonfatal’ rather than death, morbidity and no morbidity.”

Later I received a call from a more senior Finn executive, Jim Luetkeneyer, who said the “nonfatal drowning” term was used for very severe injuries, but that it is difficult to communicate that to the public. There is no handy term like “drowning” to express it, so they use “nonfatal drowning.” (I was not surprised later to find that Luetkeneyer had written of himself, “As long as it can help clients highlight their message, a unique tactic can really help a campaign stand apart from the competition, especially in risk averse Washington.”)

This was a novel concept, even for public relations. Bureaucrats for the World Health Organization are not generally known as etymologists, even if Finn Partners was characterizing WHO’s policies accurately. Moreover, no one – in or out of P.R. – should be shopping around for meanings of words that suit their clients’ needs from people who are NOT linguistic experts.

When the U.S. government in Vietnam used “terminated with extreme prejudice” as a euphemism for its assassinations or in Afghanistan used “enhanced interrogation techniques” as a substitute for torture, how is that different from inflating statistics with “nonfatal drownings”? Is it different because it is done with good intentions? This is a slippery slope. After all, “enhanced interrogations” was used by the Gestapo as a term for torture, which is uncomfortably close to our government’s term for the same practice.

When manipulation of language becomes acceptable behavior for government – or spokespeople for government – it has set a powerful example for other with less noble motives. And as Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, “Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example.”

As Brandeis also said, we should be most on guard against government abuses “when the government’s purposes are beneficent.”

Dennis Myers is an award winning journalist who has reported on Nevada’s capital, government and politics for several decades. He has also served as Nevada’s chief deputy secretary of state.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
STEVE SEBELIUS: Was Trump campaigning or trolling in Nevada?

If Trump’s visit was primarily a political stunt rather than a legitimate attempt to court the Nevada vote — and there’s reason to suspect it was — then give his campaign credit for a well-played weekend.

Will America be the next great civilization to fall?

As I watch and read the news reports of the shooting of the police officers in Compton, California, my faith in humankind’s future has doubts creeping around the edges of my thoughts.

DEBRA SAUNDERS: In exclusive interview, Trump slams Sisolak, defends indoor rally

President Donald Trump told the Review-Journal on Sunday that he did not believe he was subject to an order limiting gatherings to 50 people when he addressed a crowd of thousands at an indoor rally in Henderson.

Are we sure we are really ‘following the science’?

Now I don’t think that phrase, “follow the science” means what we think it means. I know we hear it a lot, but I’d like to show three instances when it just doesn’t really mean what we think it means.

I-15 traffic is proof that Nevada tourism is recovering

The amount of traffic from Southern California on I-15 into and out of Las Vegas for the Labor Day holiday is yet another strong indicator that people are suffering from COVID-19 pandemic fatigue and ready to get on with their lives.

Sisolak, Trump at odds from the very beginning

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak and President Donald Trump haven’t enjoyed the best relationship since Sisolak was elected in 2018.