41°F
weather icon Clear

TIM BURKE:

The chaos surrounding the presidential election bears a semblance to the “hurry-up” offense in the NFL to avoid changing the outcome of a play.

In the NFL, when the offense wants to prevent the officials from changing a call or no-call penalty, they hurry up to the line of scrimmage and snap the ball.

Once the ball is snapped, officials can’t go back and change the previous play. The opposing team tries to prevent the offense from quickly snapping the ball by tossing a challenge “red flag” on the field to have the play reviewed.

After a review, the officials can affect the play by calling a penalty, removing or changing a penalty, or changing the ball’s placement on the field. If the officials find no substantial justification to change the play’s outcome, they do nothing, and play continues.

The Democrats are rushing to put everything in place, which gives the perception that they are avoiding any voting scrutiny. The Trump team has chosen to throw a “red flag” by challenging the results. The Democrats insist that the outcome will not change, and Joe Biden will be the next president. That very well may be right. The Trump camp is challenging the “play” by asking for the votes to be confirmed as correctly counted and legitimate. The number of mail-in ballots for this election is unprecedented. It is fair to assume that not every voting district could handle the volume, and there are yet, unproven accusations of impropriety.

The Democrats are taking the wrong strategy. They should support making sure that every vote was legitimate and correctly counted. If the outcome stays the same, it eliminates any doubt that their candidate did win the election fairly.

Allowing the ballots to be validated will strengthen their promotion of the mail-in ballots as a substitute for in-person voting for future elections.

If there were problems, it could be an opportunity to learn and solve whatever issues might be discovered to help the election process in future elections.

The election was far from a Democratic party platform’s political mandate, with the popular count remarkably close between the two candidates. Curiously, in contrast to the presidential results, the Democrats lost seats in the House of Representatives, and it appears that the Republicans will maintain control of the Senate. A similar result took place in Nevada, with Republicans gaining in the state Assembly and possibly the Senate. It is logical to assume that those voters who elected Republicans would also have voted for Trump.

Arguments and litigation surrounding the presidential election are not unprecedented. During the presidential election of 2000, it took 37 days to decide Bush versus Gore and ended up in court.

In a per curium decision, the Supreme Court first ruled 7–2 (Justices Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissenting), strictly on equal protection grounds, that the recount stop.

Specifically, using different counting standards in other counties violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court decision allowed the previous vote certification made by Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris to stand for George W. Bush, who thereby won Florida’s 25 electoral votes. Florida’s votes gave Bush, the Republican candidate, 271 electoral votes, one more than the 270 required to win the Electoral College.

The Supreme Court decision meant the defeat of Democratic candidate Al Gore, who won 267 electoral votes.

Even though Joe Biden is the presumptive winner, states must certify their respective state’s election before an Electoral College vote. The Electoral College must vote before any candidate is declared the winner of an election. Electors meet in their states to cast their ballots for president and vice president on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December. In every state except Nebraska and Maine, electors vote on a “winner takes all” basis, meaning whichever candidate wins the state’s presidential race receives all the state’s electoral votes.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next few weeks.

Tim Burke is a businessman, philanthropist, educator and Pahrump resident. Contact him at timstakenv@gmail.com

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Bill of Rights?

Back in January when the “novel coronavirus” was finally making the news, after the debacle of impeachment was over, I was very interested as I watched the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) shut down a city with 35 million residents. My first reaction was, “This could never happen in America as we have a Bill of Rights.” Boy was I wrong.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Lessons learned

This past year has seen a lot of changes and most not for the better. As I sit here thinking it over, here are some of the things I have learned.

TIM BURKE: Possible second mandated shutdown would be disastrous

The recent rapid increase in COVID-19 positives is threatening to close businesses and halt family holiday gatherings temporarily. The post-election decrease in COVID-19 positives that some theorized would take place due to the election did not materialize. The exact opposite has happened.

STEVE SEBELIUS: 2020 election mandate? Compromise

Democrats long hoped for a supermajority in the Nevada Legislature; instead, the mixed election results will force both sides to work together to find consensus to fix vexing problems.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: More division coming up

President “projected” Biden stated that he will unite our country. Well, that’s good because his party spent the last four years dividing us. From the end of the election in 2016, the Democrats have refused to accept the results, but rather spent the last four years calling Trump illegitimate, a fraud, and of course tried to impeach him many times. The one time they actually went through with it, they knew it would fail in the Senate, but to meddle in the next election, they did it anyway, During Obama’s administration, there were many times some Republicans wanted to impeach Obama, but with the Senate being held by Harry Reid, they knew it would only be a show and cause division, so they did not.

As Mental Health Comes out of the Shadows, So Should Insurance Coverage to Increase Access to Care

Anyone who has ever tried to navigate the crazy task of selecting an individual health insurance policy knows the fundamental problem is figuring out exactly what you’re buying. Then, traversing the dizzying maze of HMOs, doctors, hospitals, co-pays, deductibles, allowable procedures, and coverage eligibility only increases the frustration.