40°F
weather icon Clear

VICTOR JOECKS: Vaccinate seniors before prisoners

Gov. Steve Sisolak shouldn’t vaccinate felons before senior citizens. Even a casual look at the coronavirus death numbers makes this obvious.

In the Nevada vaccination playbook, Sisolak laid out the order in which Nevadans are eligible to receive the coronavirus vaccine. Tier 1 consists mainly of health care workers and nursing home residents and staff. State officials estimated there are 173,000 people in tier 1.

This part of his plan makes sense. Medical professionals help treat those who get sick and could be easily exposed. Nursing home patients are by far the most vulnerable population. Nationally, long-term care residents account for 38 percent of coronavirus deaths. As of 2015, fewer than 0.5 percent of the U.S. population lived in nursing homes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

So far so good. Then comes Tier 2, which is based on employment. Within each “tier,” subgroups are listed by priority order. Tier 2 starts with teachers and then runs through a list of job categories, including college faculty, public transportation workers and people in agriculture. Prisoners are included at the bottom of tier 2. Because those over 65 are more likely to be retired, most won’t be included in these job groups. There are an estimated 271,000 people in tier 2.

At the top of Tier 3 are released offenders in transitional housing and homeless people. Then come people with underlying health conditions. More than 2 million people later, you finally see vaccine distribution prioritized for those age 65 and older without underlying health conditions. Some elderly individuals would be eligible to receive the vaccine in other categories.

This plan would make some sense if coronavirus deaths were distributed evenly across age ranges. They aren’t. Nevada’s own data — which aligns with evidence from around the world — proves it.

As of Tuesday morning, a little more than 3,200 people in Nevada have died from coronavirus. More than 2,000 of them were over 70. More than 600 were ages 60 to 69. Among those under 40, fewer than 70 have passed away. These numbers were calculated using data from the state’s new coronavirus dashboard.

Those under 30 have a 99.97 percent chance or better of surviving the coronavirus after testing positive. Those from 30 to 50 have a 99.6 percent chance or better of surviving after a positive coronavirus test. From 50 to 59, it’s 99 percent. From 60 to 65, it’s 97 percent. Those older than 70 have an 88.62 percent chance of doing so.

Considering that many asymptomatic people don’t get tested, the actual survival rate is likely higher for all groups. Regardless, the heightened risk as people get older is plain to see.

Put another way, among those over 70, one in eight people who’ve tested positive for the coronavirus has died from it. Among those 20 to 29, it’s one in 3,000. Statistically, there will be fewer deaths among 3,000 people ages 20 to 29 testing positive, than if 30 people older than 70 test positive.

This information, readily available to Sisolak for months, makes it clear how to prioritize vaccines — by age, not job or incarceration status.

To his credit, Sisolak announced last week that those 75 and older would be moved into Tier 2. It’s unclear if they will be ranked above prisoners or other job groups. They should be. Sisolak should also scrap the job categories for nonmedical workers and prioritize vaccine access by age, until all those 50 and older have had a chance to receive a vaccine.

Under the guise of trying to save lives, Sisolak has spent months imposing ineffective lockdowns. Even while wielding kingly power, he couldn’t stop the coronavirus from spreading. But his decisions on vaccine distribution really could save — or cost — lives.

There’s still time to fix his flawed plan. Sisolak must follow the data and place elderly Nevadans next in line to receive the vaccine — ahead of prisoners, younger workers and the homeless.

Contact Victor Joecks at vjoecks@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4698.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

Out-of-town reader supportive of Pahrump after reading local news

Letters to the Editor

Many double standards prevail in political circles

TIM BURKE: First Amendment rights in danger on major social media platforms

Freedom of expression is one of our most cherished rights. Over the weekend, the conservative social media platform, Parler, headquartered in Henderson, Nevada, was shut down when Amazon turned off the web services that hosted the platform.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Open Letter to Nevada House Delegation

To the honorable Representatives of our State. I am taking a moment to write and plead with you to act in the best interest of America rather than your political party. I heard Speaker Pelosi say, on 60 minutes, that one reason to impeach President Trump was so that he could never run again. While your Party has been talking about election interference since 2016 and spent 40 million dollars of our money to investigate “Russian Collusion”, no collusion was found.

Letters to the Editor

Resident disputes timing of trash disposal rate increase

DEBRA J. SAUNDERS: How to start a civil war

President Donald Trump’s supporters didn’t think through what would have happened if they’d succeeded in overturning the legitimate 2020 election.

Letters to the Editor

Reader states mural not good use of taxpayer money

DAN SCHINHOFEN: How fragile it all is

If we have not agreed on or learned anything this past year, we should all agree that our freedoms are very fragile. Look at how quickly we conceded our God-given rights to freely exercise our religion, or our right to own property, as in owning a small business. With just a few words from our elected governor, and a declaration here and a directive there we were told it was not safe for us to sing in church. We were directed to close down our business that we spent money, and years of sweat building up to support our families, because we were not deemed “essential”.