34°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Talking about voter suppression amid record turnout

Today’s list of oft-discussed, yet mythical, beings includes Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster and the people legally entitled to vote but prevented from doing so by a “voter suppression” law.

On Saturday, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., was in town stumping for Democratic candidates. She claimed that Republican candidates want to limit voter rights. She contrasted that with Democrat support for the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which would impose a federal overhaul of state election law. The bill would gut state-specific voter ID laws, make it harder to clean up voter rolls and allow ballot harvesting. It would require states to allow online, automatic and same-day voter registration.

“We should be making it easier for people to vote and not harder for them to vote,” she said.

Claiming that voting rights are under attack is a frequent Democratic talking point. Earlier this year, President Joe Biden gave a speech in Atlanta promoting that bill. He implied that those who opposed it were racists.

“History has never been kind to those who have sided with voter suppression over voters’ rights,” he said. He then compared those who opposed the bill to George Wallace, “Bull” Connor and Jefferson Davis.

In case that wasn’t clear enough, Mr. Biden called election integrity laws in states like Georgia, “Jim Crow 2.0.” He claimed those laws are about “voter suppression.”

Someone forgot to mention this to the people of Georgia. That state had record early voting turnout during its primary this year. More than 850,000 people voted early this year. In 2018, less than 300,000 did. That was a 168 percent increase. That included a significant rise among Black voters. Overall, turnout was much higher. It topped 1.9 million in 2022, compared to 1.16 million in 2018.

So much for voter suppression.

Politicians like Ms. Klobuchar and Mr. Biden are intelligent enough to understand this. But accusations of “voter suppression” are simply too useful politically to give up. It’s estimated that somewhere around 90 percent of Black voters cast their ballot for Mr. Biden. But he and his fellow Democrats don’t have a great record to run on. Inflation and crime are up. School closures disproportionately hurt Black students.

Democrats can’t run on the merits of their policies, so they claim Republicans want to suppress minority voters. Ironically, the vast majority of Black voters support voter ID laws. But this deeply cynical strategy depends on headlines, not details.

If Republican-passed voting laws were suppressing voters, you wouldn’t be seeing record turnout. Nevadans should recognize claims like these as the politically motivated scare tactics that they are.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

It’s time to address the inequalities in our nation, not point fingers over who is patriot or not. We’re all Americans first and foremost.

Letters to the Editor

After reading the letter from a “moderate Republican”, with a severe case of TDS,

BOVEE — Election results: What does it all mean?

First, something it doesn’t mean: the Nov. 4 election is not a wholesale rejection of Trump and his policy.

Letters to the Editor

Government shutdowns are becoming almost like ‘political holidays’ for so many in government.

Letters to the Editor

As a moderate Republican I am just shaking my head at the mindless automatons we actually call elected officials who have been storming around causing complete chaos on Capitol Hill for two weeks.

Letters to the Editor

Residents of the Autumnwood subdivision have been under what many in the community feel is an attack on their rights by the Nye County commissioners.

Letters to the Editor

Short-term rentals are not a threat to our community. They are an economic lifeline for many retirees, working families, and property owners like myself.

Letters to the Editor

A town board is just that, a town board, no enforcement or regulatory authority.

Letters to the Editor

If Dr. Waters wants to bring it back, he should list positive things that were in fact done and propose changes for the future – not make an argument based on a hypothetical.