34°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Joe Biden’s nostalgia for the Jimmy Carter years

They say history doesn’t repeat itself, but the Biden administration is eager to prove otherwise as it pushes the United States back in time to the Jimmy Carter years.

It’s bad enough that Mr. Biden’s policies have led to rampant inflation, high interest rates and a potential recession — all reminiscent of the economic malaise that the nation endured during Mr. Carter’s four years in office. Now the president — desperate to deflect blame for high gas prices in hopes of avoiding an election debacle — threatens to revisit one of the worst ideas from the late 1970s, a “windfall” profits tax.

Unless oil and gas companies ramp up production, Mr. Biden warned, he would advocate for punitive levies. “If they don’t, they’re going to pay a higher tax on their excess profits and face other restrictions,” the president said Monday. “My team will work with Congress to look at these options that are available to us and others.”

The president’s salvo comes as oil companies have reported record earnings in recent months. That’s what happens when high demand accompanies scarce supply. Mr. Biden has eagerly contributed to the latter, pledging to put oil and gas producers out of business while doing everything in his regulatory authority to discourage them from tapping our domestic resources. Is it any surprise, then, that U.S. energy companies are reluctant to make long-term investments designed to increase supply?

As should be expected from Mr. Biden’s dismal economic record, his latest policy prescription would make things only worse. “It’s a horrible idea, small thinking,” Patrick Montalban, the president of Montalban Oil and Gas, a producer in North Dakota and Montana, told The New York Times. “It’s going to take away from exploration and production of domestic oil and gas. It’s that simple. Total politics.”

It’s apparently of no concern to the president that Mr. Carter’s experiment with a “windfall” profits tax in 1980 was — surprise! — a failure. “Domestic production fell and dependence on foreign oil increased, while forecasts of revenue from the windfall tax turned out to be overly optimistic,” the Times reports. Congress repealed the tax in 1988. In addition, as the Tax Foundation notes, Mr. Biden’s tax plan would do nothing to lower prices and could instead push them higher. If foreign producers are unable or unwilling to fill the gap when domestic production declines thanks to the new tax, “pump prices will rise to bring demand in line with newly-reduced supply.”

Of course, Mr. Biden could potentially avoid that dilemma by begging the Saudis and OPEC to rescue him from his own agenda. Oh … never mind.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

It’s time to address the inequalities in our nation, not point fingers over who is patriot or not. We’re all Americans first and foremost.

Letters to the Editor

After reading the letter from a “moderate Republican”, with a severe case of TDS,

BOVEE — Election results: What does it all mean?

First, something it doesn’t mean: the Nov. 4 election is not a wholesale rejection of Trump and his policy.

Letters to the Editor

Government shutdowns are becoming almost like ‘political holidays’ for so many in government.

Letters to the Editor

As a moderate Republican I am just shaking my head at the mindless automatons we actually call elected officials who have been storming around causing complete chaos on Capitol Hill for two weeks.

Letters to the Editor

Residents of the Autumnwood subdivision have been under what many in the community feel is an attack on their rights by the Nye County commissioners.

Letters to the Editor

Short-term rentals are not a threat to our community. They are an economic lifeline for many retirees, working families, and property owners like myself.

Letters to the Editor

A town board is just that, a town board, no enforcement or regulatory authority.

Letters to the Editor

If Dr. Waters wants to bring it back, he should list positive things that were in fact done and propose changes for the future – not make an argument based on a hypothetical.