34°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Biden’s land grab would hurt Nevada

The Biden administration’s newest lands plan is bad news for Western states, and it will disproportionately hurt Nevada.

Nevada is one of the largest states in the country in terms of area. But it’s a much different story if you subtract land owned by the federal government. Washington controls more than 56 million of Nevada’s 70.3 million acres. That’s more than 80 percent of the state. All land data comes from a 2020 Congressional Research Service report.

That leaves Nevada with just more than 14 million acres available for private ownership and state and local governments. To visualize, that’s about 10 percent smaller than West Virginia, and the federal government owns less than 8 percent of that state. If you excluded land owned by the federal government, Nevada would fall from the seventh-largest state to the 10th smallest.

Nevadans for decades have lived with this vast federal presence. Most residents understand the importance of the Nevada Test and Training Range. Millions enjoy the beauty of places such as Lake Mead National Recreation Area and Great Basin National Park. But millions of other acres are also under the domain of the Bureau of Land Management, the dominant landlord. It oversees two-thirds of Nevada’s real estate. It’s why the Las Vegas Valley is surrounded by desert and is running out of developable land.

Nevada has it the worst, but it’s not the only state under the federal government’s thumb. The feds own around 46 percent of all land in Western states. In all the remaining states, the average is around 4 percent. There’s a disparity worth remedying.

Instead, BLM wants to lock away more land. It’s proposed a new rule that would allow groups to rent land for “conservation.” Never mind that BLM ownership already means land use is severely restricted. While the rule would honor existing leases for things such as timber harvesting or oil drilling, it would prohibit other uses on land marked for “conservation.” It’s easy to imagine the Biden administration renting millions of acres to prevent uses environmentalists oppose. That could even include solar plants.

“The proposed rule could push BLM lands into a protection-oriented management regime more akin to the National Park Service than an agency statutorily obligated to promote multiple use and sustained yield,” Gov. Joe Lombardo and five other governors wrote in a letter addressing the issue.

This a land grab, pure and simple. It would empower federal bureaucrats at the expense of Nevada residents and governments. The goal should be to transfer nonenvironmentally sensitive lands — particularly in the state’s urban areas — into private hands. The Biden administration’s proposed rule would make that more difficult. It’s a bad idea.

This commentary was originally published in the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

It’s time to address the inequalities in our nation, not point fingers over who is patriot or not. We’re all Americans first and foremost.

Letters to the Editor

After reading the letter from a “moderate Republican”, with a severe case of TDS,

BOVEE — Election results: What does it all mean?

First, something it doesn’t mean: the Nov. 4 election is not a wholesale rejection of Trump and his policy.

Letters to the Editor

Government shutdowns are becoming almost like ‘political holidays’ for so many in government.

Letters to the Editor

As a moderate Republican I am just shaking my head at the mindless automatons we actually call elected officials who have been storming around causing complete chaos on Capitol Hill for two weeks.

Letters to the Editor

Residents of the Autumnwood subdivision have been under what many in the community feel is an attack on their rights by the Nye County commissioners.

Letters to the Editor

Short-term rentals are not a threat to our community. They are an economic lifeline for many retirees, working families, and property owners like myself.

Letters to the Editor

A town board is just that, a town board, no enforcement or regulatory authority.

Letters to the Editor

If Dr. Waters wants to bring it back, he should list positive things that were in fact done and propose changes for the future – not make an argument based on a hypothetical.