34°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Student loan freeze didn’t help borrowers shed debt

President Joe Biden is already scheming to get around last week’s Supreme Court ruling that invalidated his effort to unilaterally make billions in student loan debt disappear. If Plan B involves more executive branch legerdemain not authorized by the Constitution — the details remain murky — expect another legal challenge.

In the meantime, the administration should consider whether the 40-month “pause” on loan payments — implemented during the height of COVID and extended nine times — succeeded in easing the financial burden that hit many borrowers during the pandemic. At least one study finds the opposite.

A University of Chicago analysis published last month found that student loan recipients who stopped payments increased their overall debt burden because they “sharply increased mortgage, auto and credit card borrowing.” On average, those who took advantage of the payment moratorium added an additional $1,500 in consumer debt.

“We show that borrowers used the new liquidity to increase borrowing on credit cards, mortgages and auto loans rather than avoid delinquencies,” researchers from the university’s Becker Friedman Institute for Economics concluded, finding that “perhaps paradoxically, temporary student debt relief leads to higher overall household debt levels and larger future debt burdens.”

The purpose of the payment pause was to provide a breather to borrowers struggling during COVID, not to encourage them to rack up more debt. In fact, going deeper into the red too often compounds financial ills. Indeed, the New York Times reported, “In recent months, the (University of Chicago) paper found, those borrowers have started to become delinquent on their loans at higher rates — raising the concern that the resumption of student loan payments could drive more of them into default.”

But whose fault is that? Why doesn’t a borrower have some personal responsibility to make good on his or her obligations?

In addition, the study doesn’t even address the fact that borrowers who haven’t made payments for more than three years are now that much further away from getting out from under their student loans.

To be sure, a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic and the economic havoc and uncertainty it wrought called for unusual measures. A student loan freeze was a reasonable short-term response. But to keep such a policy in place for months — even years — after the economy bounced back was an expensive mistake. Not only are many borrowers worse off than before the pause, the American taxpayers are out $5 billion for every month Mr. Biden extended the payment suspension. It was lose-lose.

This commentary was originally published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

It’s time to address the inequalities in our nation, not point fingers over who is patriot or not. We’re all Americans first and foremost.

Letters to the Editor

After reading the letter from a “moderate Republican”, with a severe case of TDS,

BOVEE — Election results: What does it all mean?

First, something it doesn’t mean: the Nov. 4 election is not a wholesale rejection of Trump and his policy.

Letters to the Editor

Government shutdowns are becoming almost like ‘political holidays’ for so many in government.

Letters to the Editor

As a moderate Republican I am just shaking my head at the mindless automatons we actually call elected officials who have been storming around causing complete chaos on Capitol Hill for two weeks.

Letters to the Editor

Residents of the Autumnwood subdivision have been under what many in the community feel is an attack on their rights by the Nye County commissioners.

Letters to the Editor

Short-term rentals are not a threat to our community. They are an economic lifeline for many retirees, working families, and property owners like myself.

Letters to the Editor

A town board is just that, a town board, no enforcement or regulatory authority.

Letters to the Editor

If Dr. Waters wants to bring it back, he should list positive things that were in fact done and propose changes for the future – not make an argument based on a hypothetical.