35°F
weather icon Clear

EDITORIAL: Regulatory thicket will dog victims of California fires

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, desperate to appear as if he’s leading on the wildfire debacle, now tacitly admits that his state’s onerous regulatory apparatus represents an obstacle to blaze victims hoping to eventually reclaim their lives. Rather than a total overhaul, though, he prefers to nibble around the edges.

On Sunday, Gov. Newsom signed an executive order easing some permitting requirements for those who lost their homes or businesses in the fires that ravaged Pacific Palisades, Altadena and other areas near Los Angeles. The edict allows those hoping to rebuild to bypass certain requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Coastal Act.

“California leads the nation in environmental stewardship. I’m not going to give that up,” Gov. Newsom said on “Meet the Press.” “But one thing I won’t give into is delay. Delay is denial for people: lives, traditions, places torn apart, torn asunder.”

That’s certainly a noble sentiment. But where was that ingenuity when it came to developers and entrepreneurs hoping to meet housing demand in the Golden State while trying to hack their way through the dense regulatory thicket that defines California’s administrative state?

In fact, the governor’s order has significant limitations. The Los Angeles Times reported that the Coastal Act already provides exceptions for fire rebuilds. At the same time, single-family homes are exempt under the Environmental Quality Act. A spokesman for the California Building Industry Association lauded the governor’s move but noted that local governments will also have to relax burdensome regulations if areas are to be rebuilt.

An attorney with one of California’s largest real estate firms told the Daily Journal, which covers the state’s legal profession, that, for many victims, “the problems will extend to remediation of contamination on the site, which is covered by state agencies like the Department of Toxic Substances Control.”

Other attorneys told the news outlet that victims probably will face new limits on what can be built thanks to changes in zoning laws that have been implemented since the homes were first constructed.

In fact, Gov. Newsom has not gone far enough — as those hoping to rebuild will soon discover. “It’s good optics,” one land use expert told the Daily Journal of the governor’s order. “It’s not clear how widespread a benefit” it will have.

Nevada and other states have generously sent manpower, equipment, financial and other assistance to California to help the state douse the fires and recover from the devastation. If Gov. Newsom wants to facilitate reconstruction, he might also request technical help from those running states and municipalities who actually know how to encourage development rather than relying on those expert in killing it.

The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

It’s time to address the inequalities in our nation, not point fingers over who is patriot or not. We’re all Americans first and foremost.

Letters to the Editor

After reading the letter from a “moderate Republican”, with a severe case of TDS,

BOVEE — Election results: What does it all mean?

First, something it doesn’t mean: the Nov. 4 election is not a wholesale rejection of Trump and his policy.

Letters to the Editor

Government shutdowns are becoming almost like ‘political holidays’ for so many in government.

Letters to the Editor

As a moderate Republican I am just shaking my head at the mindless automatons we actually call elected officials who have been storming around causing complete chaos on Capitol Hill for two weeks.

Letters to the Editor

Residents of the Autumnwood subdivision have been under what many in the community feel is an attack on their rights by the Nye County commissioners.

Letters to the Editor

Short-term rentals are not a threat to our community. They are an economic lifeline for many retirees, working families, and property owners like myself.

Letters to the Editor

A town board is just that, a town board, no enforcement or regulatory authority.

Letters to the Editor

If Dr. Waters wants to bring it back, he should list positive things that were in fact done and propose changes for the future – not make an argument based on a hypothetical.