weather icon Mostly Clear

Cherry picking science can injure children

In the 1920s, Albert Einstein admitted he made a mistake in his great theory of relativity. He admitted another error in 1938.

In 2013, Stephen Hawking admitted an error in his formulation of the big bang theory.

In 2010, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — which tracks science on climate change for the United Nations — admitted it had made a mistake about the melt rate of Himalayan glaciers.

Scientists admit their mistakes all the time.

Pop figures who engage in combat about science, on the other hand, do not. They have to keep reshaping information to prove their original belief, cherry ­picking information that fits their preconception and excluding information that does not.

Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carrey, and Robert Kennedy Jr., for instance, have never admitted that they were wrong about vaccines causing autism. In Kennedy’s case, an article he wrote for Slate and Rolling Stone that made the argument for a link between vaccines and autism was shot through with so many errors that both publications – after watching the corrections pile up next to the article – finally removed it from their websites.

McCarthy, when faced with actual physicians on the Larry King Show, was unable to dispute their knowledge, so she cursed them on the air with an obscenity I will spare our readers.

In Nevada, former U.S. House member Jim Gibbons once put his name to a paper that cherry­ picked the science in order to describe mercury as more or less harmless.

When she was a member of the Nevada Legislature, Sharron Angle introduced an unsuccessful measure that would have required physicians to repeat to their patients a dubious claim about abortion causing breast cancer.

To support the bill, she cherry picked the science to cite the few studies in support and ignore the more numerous studies that undercut the claim. In one case, she cited the initial 1994 phase of a study (which supported her position) and ignored the final 1996 conclusion of that study (which did not).

Scientists let evidence lead them to a conclusion. Dogmatists start with a conclusion and seek out evidence to support it, excluding any evidence that doesn’t fit.

Last week two new scientific studies suggested that undersea volcanic activity could affect climate change. Note that word: “could.” Scientists around the world now will absorb the new information and do their own studies. That’s how science moves — slowly.

But critics of the science of climate change, who reject the massive science in support of the scientific consensus, embraced onto the two new studies to try, again, to challenge that consensus.

Within hours, they were citing it as evidence against man-made climate change. For instance, at a site called The Pirate’s Cover, an unsigned essay went up:

“Wait, the models may be wrong? The hell you say! This is certainly not the first bit of research regarding undersea volcanoes, and it won’t be the last. The reality of climate change is that most is caused by nature, just like has always occurred.”

The problem is, the two volcano studies said no such thing. That same anonymous essay was then lifted by a site called Beforeitsnews.com and will no doubt find its way to others in the internet’s now well known dance of misinformation.

Scientists are treating the volcano studies with respect. Partisans in the climate change battles are treating them as ammunition, by misrepresenting them.

When two presidential candidates recently pandered to the anti­science fringe, it spoke volumes about their character.

Chris Christie and Rand Paul either really believe there is doubt about the science and are ignorant or they know the truth and are cynical.

Cherry picking science, misrepresenting the views of scientists, rejecting information that conflicts with a pre­conceived notion are all dishonest. And when, as in the current vaccination debate, they endanger children, it’s more — and less — than just a debate.

Dennis Myers is an award winning journalist who has reported on Nevada’s capital, government and politics for several decades. He has also served as Nevada’s chief deputy secretary of state.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
TALK OF THE TOWN: Pahrump ‘fired up’ after claims from firefighters unions

PVT readers share their thoughts about a 56-point list of health, safety and mismanagement concerns co-written by members of the local firefighters union that called for Pahrump Fire Rescue Chief Scott Lewis to step down — or face removal from his position.

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS | Share your stories of ‘progress through perseverance’

In fewer than 350 words, we invite you to tell us about an initiative or project that you or your organization have successfully executed since the pandemic. Describe the problems you faced, and explain how you solved them. Tell us about the people behind the project who propelled it foward. Lastly, share a bit on how others in the community benefited from your progress. We will publish excerpts from the best stories, along with photos that celebrate PROGRESS through perseverance in an upcoming special section.

GUEST COMMENTARY: Why Esmeralda County supports the Rhyolite Ridge project

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in the July 2, 2021 edition of the Pahrump Valley Times and is being republished here as advancements on the Rhyolite Ridge mining project are made. The co-writers of this column were Nancy Boland, a former chairwoman of the Esmeralda County Commission who has served on the Esmeralda County Land Use Advisory Committee, along with Kathy Keyes, Greg Dedera and Mark Hartman, residents of Fish Lake Valley. Public comment for the Rhyolite Ridge Lithium-Boron Mine Project in Esmeralda County ends Feb. 3, 2023.

EDITORIAL: The PERS crisis no one is talking about

The Public Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada is doing so poorly that officials want to underfund it to avoid a spike in contribution rates. Not great.