40°F
weather icon Clear

Letter to editor

Section 1031 necessary part of Nevada tax code

There’s an old saying, “If it ain’t broke, why fix it?” This adage is especially true when it comes to a well-functioning tax code, such as Section 1031, also known as “like kind” exchanges. Like-kind exchanges are a tried-and-true part of our nation’s tax code which strengthens our economy and encourages reinvestment in Nevada’s businesses. Section 1031 works as a forceful investment tool for Nevada’s commercial real estate market, creating opportunity for economic growth.

As the owner of Pahrump Access Realty, I see firsthand how Section 1031 works to bolster the commercial real estate market. In fact, if it were repealed, it would harm both the commercial real estate market and consumers alike. Section 1031 helps keep commercial property taxes low, encourages allocation of resources to improve buildings and new construction, and stimulates overall real estate activity.

Critics state Section 1031 is an “unfair tax break,” but in truth, it is a powerful tax incentive. Taxpayers do not profit from like-kind exchanges, as the taxpayer must demonstrate continued ownership and like-kind exchanges work as though the asset was never sold. Without this important incentive, many transactions would never happen because of the costly taxes assessed.

Without Section 1031, commercial property taxes would increase, property values would drop, and there would be less investment in building improvements and new construction. Consumers would also feel the effect through rising and unstable rental costs (needed to make eventual new construction possible) and fewer options for affordable housing.

Keep the tax as it is now – and has been since 1921 – to encourage economic activity and provide a powerful tax incentive for Nevada businesses.

Kim Washington

Broker/Owner

Access Realty LLC

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
TIM BURKE: New mandates feel like violation of personal rights

I am at home by myself, sitting at my desk and typing on my computer with a face mask on. No, not really, because under Governor Sisolak’s Emergency Directive 035, being alone exempts me from that requirement. The surge in COVID-19 positives and government directives in response has made this our new reality. For the third time in less than two weeks, Nevada on Tuesday set a record for most coronavirus cases reported in a day since the start of the pandemic, state data shows. According to the Department of Health and Human Services website, there were 2,853 new cases reported Tuesday, along with 24 additional deaths. The updated figures brought totals in the state to 139,080 cases and 2,047 deaths.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Bill of Rights?

Back in January when the “novel coronavirus” was finally making the news, after the debacle of impeachment was over, I was very interested as I watched the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) shut down a city with 35 million residents. My first reaction was, “This could never happen in America as we have a Bill of Rights.” Boy was I wrong.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Lessons learned

This past year has seen a lot of changes and most not for the better. As I sit here thinking it over, here are some of the things I have learned.

TIM BURKE: Possible second mandated shutdown would be disastrous

The recent rapid increase in COVID-19 positives is threatening to close businesses and halt family holiday gatherings temporarily. The post-election decrease in COVID-19 positives that some theorized would take place due to the election did not materialize. The exact opposite has happened.

STEVE SEBELIUS: 2020 election mandate? Compromise

Democrats long hoped for a supermajority in the Nevada Legislature; instead, the mixed election results will force both sides to work together to find consensus to fix vexing problems.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: More division coming up

President “projected” Biden stated that he will unite our country. Well, that’s good because his party spent the last four years dividing us. From the end of the election in 2016, the Democrats have refused to accept the results, but rather spent the last four years calling Trump illegitimate, a fraud, and of course tried to impeach him many times. The one time they actually went through with it, they knew it would fail in the Senate, but to meddle in the next election, they did it anyway, During Obama’s administration, there were many times some Republicans wanted to impeach Obama, but with the Senate being held by Harry Reid, they knew it would only be a show and cause division, so they did not.