39°F
weather icon Clear

Letters to the editor of the Pahrump Valley Times

Responsible gun carrying is security for all of us

I am writing this as a Nevadan 69 years of age and a 23-year resident of Pahrump. Particularly, I am one of a growing number of folks who conscientiously wear a sidearm responsibly for the security of all in a potentially dangerous time. For the newcomers to town, they will quickly learn that Nevada is an open-carry state. This means that convicted felons and those convicted of domestic violence aren’t included. If your record is clean of this sort of thing, you may wear an open-carry sidearm without a license or permit.

Many long years ago I was certified as a firearms instructor by the National Rifle Association and lots of practice has honed my skills. I am not the only one with skills and dedication hereabouts, however. There are plenty of us. Whenever I meet someone packing a sidearm I happily congratulate that person as this is my way of encouraging Americans to uphold the Second Amendment and to contribute to generally discouraging crime wherever we go.

Now here is the bonus we who carry our sidearms should be especially aware of. We should consider that armed citizens commonly seen all over town are an excellent deterrent to crime. And most importantly, the time may come when one of us may have the opportunity to assist an officer who may be hard-pressed and in danger. My mindset is precisely consciously aligned with this possibility. Such a situation of this type certainly would be rare, but not impossible. We should all be real citizens every day.

One day in the Pahrump Library a lady asked me if I would protect her if she were attacked there. I told her that it was highly unlikely what she suggested would happen. But, I humbly assured her I would do my best if necessary. We all should be ready to do our best. The Pahrump Flagman, Ray Mielzynski, wears sidearms. I am sure he would be pleased if more of us did also.

Paul J. Miller

Gee thanks, Social Security Administration!

Last year the Social Security Administration increased our benefit “because of a rise in the cost of living”. However, they increased the Medicare deduction by the same amount so that the net benefit was the exactly same as the year before.

They did the same this year, but there must have been a clerical error somewhere because the net benefit is one dollar more than the year before.

Wow, one whopping dollar for the whole year to compensate for inflation. We’ll try to be prudent and not spend it all in one place.

Our elected representatives in Congress, with the emphatic support of our hopefully soon-to-be ex-president, have pushed through a tax “reform” bill that will result in a massive transfer of wealth from the middle class and poor to the giant corporations and filthy rich. It will also increase the budget deficit by over a trillion dollars and take away health insurance for millions of people.

According to the latest poll, only 29 percent of Americans support the bill, and there are massive protest rallies all over the country opposing it.

Aren’t our elected officials supposed to represent the interests of their constituents instead of serving the billionaire donors who finance their election campaigns? Am I the only person who thinks that there is something wrong with this picture?

David G. Alexander

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Bill of Rights?

Back in January when the “novel coronavirus” was finally making the news, after the debacle of impeachment was over, I was very interested as I watched the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) shut down a city with 35 million residents. My first reaction was, “This could never happen in America as we have a Bill of Rights.” Boy was I wrong.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Lessons learned

This past year has seen a lot of changes and most not for the better. As I sit here thinking it over, here are some of the things I have learned.

TIM BURKE: Possible second mandated shutdown would be disastrous

The recent rapid increase in COVID-19 positives is threatening to close businesses and halt family holiday gatherings temporarily. The post-election decrease in COVID-19 positives that some theorized would take place due to the election did not materialize. The exact opposite has happened.

STEVE SEBELIUS: 2020 election mandate? Compromise

Democrats long hoped for a supermajority in the Nevada Legislature; instead, the mixed election results will force both sides to work together to find consensus to fix vexing problems.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: More division coming up

President “projected” Biden stated that he will unite our country. Well, that’s good because his party spent the last four years dividing us. From the end of the election in 2016, the Democrats have refused to accept the results, but rather spent the last four years calling Trump illegitimate, a fraud, and of course tried to impeach him many times. The one time they actually went through with it, they knew it would fail in the Senate, but to meddle in the next election, they did it anyway, During Obama’s administration, there were many times some Republicans wanted to impeach Obama, but with the Senate being held by Harry Reid, they knew it would only be a show and cause division, so they did not.

As Mental Health Comes out of the Shadows, So Should Insurance Coverage to Increase Access to Care

Anyone who has ever tried to navigate the crazy task of selecting an individual health insurance policy knows the fundamental problem is figuring out exactly what you’re buying. Then, traversing the dizzying maze of HMOs, doctors, hospitals, co-pays, deductibles, allowable procedures, and coverage eligibility only increases the frustration.