37°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

VICTOR JOECKS: Las Vegas is now a sanctuary city

Thanks to a federal judge in California, illegal immigrant criminals in Clark County can now rest easy. The rest of us? Not so much.

Recently, that judge issued an injunction preventing state and local law enforcement agencies from holding suspected illegal aliens for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The order didn’t include states that expressly allow civil immigration arrests. Nevada, however, hasn’t passed such a law. Last week, the Metropolitan Police Department announced that, because of the ruling, it was ending its participation in the 287(g) program. The city of Las Vegas issued a similar statement recently.

Translation: Clark County and Las Vegas now have “sanctuary city” policies in place.

The 287(g) program allowed Metro officers to use ICE databases to see if someone was in the country illegally. If so, Metro would alert ICE and detain them if ICE so requested. In 2017, Metro estimated that it notified ICE 500 times a year that someone it had arrested was in the country illegally. ICE picked up around 170 a year.

The program’s logic is obvious. Illegal immigration is a crime, but Congress hasn’t given ICE the resources it would need to conduct large-scale immigration enforcement. By collaborating with local police, ICE can deport illegal immigrants who’ve been arrested. Those are the illegal immigrants most likely to commit crimes beyond entering the country illegally.

This is a logical compromise, pending a grand immigration bargain in Washington.

Not deporting illegal immigrants after they’ve been in police custody has tragic and even deadly consequences. After Seattle-area officials implemented a sanctuary policy, two illegals who had previously been in police custody were arrested on suspicion of separate murders. Montgomery County, Maryland, implemented a sanctuary policy in July. Since then, police have arrested nine illegal immigrants for rape or sexual assault. Some had previous contact with police but weren’t deported. Kate Steinle died in 2015 after being shot by an illegal immigrant whom San Francisco had refused to hand over to ICE.

These crimes are infuriating because they are preventable. Police had someone in custody who was in the country illegally. ICE wanted to remove them. But stopping the process are progressive immigration activists who prioritize protecting illegal aliens over legal residents. Shame on them.

To its credit, Metro said it “awaits further direction” if the ruling is overturned by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But it likely will be up to the Supreme Court to reverse this madness. Metro also said it will continue working with ICE to remove illegal aliens who’ve “committed violent crimes.” It will be worth monitoring how that plays out, if it does happen. Metro has long defended the 287(g) program, successfully killing a bill in 2017 to end it.

This sanctuary policy, imposed by an Obama- appointed judge from California, makes Nevadans less safe. Let’s hope that no one here — unlike in Seattle, Maryland and San Francisco — is killed or sexually assaulted as a result.

Victor Joecks is a columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Letters to the Editor

Vern Jewett’s recent letter espousing solar farms has me scratching my head for so many reasons.

Investing in Health Access for Nevada’s Rural Communities

Rural living means we face unique challenges that urban areas often don’t, especially when it comes to accessing essential services like health care.

Letters to the Editor

Why is it that those with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) will never take the time to research the other side of an issue before opening mouth and inserting foot?

Letters to the Editor

In Wednesday’s Letters to the Editor, two letters were inadvertently combined. Our apologies to both writers. Here they are in their correct form.

A tribute to a great town and travel buddy

Just like towns, our lives are boom and bust, and this holiday season I’m just thankful for the time that we had together.

Letters to the Editor

Dr. Waters does not speak for the majority of military veterans when he disparages Donald Trump.

Letters to the Editor

It seems the narrative is, “if you can afford solar power you must be rich, so you can pay more too.”