41°F
weather icon Clear

Victor Joecks: Tax cuts increased take-home pay of Rosen’s campaign staff

In February, the campaign team of Democratic U.S. Rep. Jacky Rosen saw a pay bump — thanks to the Republican tax plan.

Rep. Rosen is challenging U.S. Sen. Dean Heller, and she has repeatedly voiced her opposition to the tax cuts Republicans passed last year. The tax cuts will “increase the economic anxiety of too many Nevada families at their kitchen tables,” she wrote in November. In December, she called it a “disastrous tax scheme” and accused Heller of raising taxes on “hardworking Nevadans.”

Given their refusal to return phone calls seeking comment, it’s debatable whether Rosen’s staff qualifies as “hardworking.” What’s not debatable is that Rosen’s FEC report shows their take-home pay increased in February 2018. That’s when new IRS withholding tables — which reflected the new tax law — went into effect. An example on the FEC website advises that campaigns should separate out an employee’s take-home pay from the taxes withheld by the campaign. This allows you to see differences in take-home pay.

Rosen pays her staff twice a month, although at the end of each quarter, she pays her staff at the beginning of the next month. That artificially boosts her cash on hand for reporting purposes.

Rosen’s highest-paid employee is campaign manager Daniel Kazin. From Oct. 1 to Jan. 31, his bimonthly paycheck was $5,353. Starting Feb. 15, his paycheck jumped to $5,555. That’s a 3.8 percent increase worth more than $4,800 a year.

It wasn’t just Kazin. Every single Rosen campaign employee who was on salary in January and February saw a pay bump. Helen Smith saw the highest pay boost by percentage. Her check went from $2,222 to $2,313, a 4.1 percent increase. That increased her net pay by more than $2,100 a year.

Even Rosen’s lowest-paid employee, August McGinnity-Wake, saw benefits. His paycheck jumped from $1,077 to $1,093, a 1.5 percent increase. That’s worth $384 a year.

Yet to the public, Rosen and her staff continue to bemoan the tax cuts. In April, her communications director, Stewart Boss, tweeted that the “GOP tax bill didn’t benefit American workers.” In December, he tweeted that “regular people get crumbs, or tax hikes.”

Boss’ paycheck, however, told a different story. In February, it increased by 3.7 percent, going from $2,744 to $2,847. The Republican tax cut plan boosted his take-home pay by more than $2,400 a year.

These facts fly in the face of Rosen’s rhetoric, but despite the mainstream media’s spin, the Republican tax plan cut taxes for most people. Ironically, the individuals most likely to see a tax hike from tax reform are rich people who live in high-tax states such as California and New York. That’s because tax reform capped the state and local tax deduction at $10,000. You know who pays more than $10,000 in state and local taxes? The rich.

This has the Democrats who run high-tax states in a panic.

The unlimited deduction for state and local taxes acted as a federal subsidy for their state’s high levies. Now that the rich — including the “1 percenters” liberals so often revile — have to pay the full cost, Democrats are worried they’ll move. So leftists, including Democrat governors in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, have created loopholes for millionaires seeking to avoid higher federal taxes. The IRS has already warned states about such schemes, but Democrat leaders are so eager to help to the rich avoid paying taxes, they’re trying anyway.

Think about where that leaves Democrats such as Rosen. They’re stuck attacking tax cuts that are putting more money in the pockets of working Americans — including her own staff — but are raising taxes on the rich in blue states.

No wonder Rosen’s been able to raise so much money in California.

Victor Joecks is a columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
DAN SCHINHOFEN: Bill of Rights?

Back in January when the “novel coronavirus” was finally making the news, after the debacle of impeachment was over, I was very interested as I watched the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) shut down a city with 35 million residents. My first reaction was, “This could never happen in America as we have a Bill of Rights.” Boy was I wrong.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: Lessons learned

This past year has seen a lot of changes and most not for the better. As I sit here thinking it over, here are some of the things I have learned.

TIM BURKE: Possible second mandated shutdown would be disastrous

The recent rapid increase in COVID-19 positives is threatening to close businesses and halt family holiday gatherings temporarily. The post-election decrease in COVID-19 positives that some theorized would take place due to the election did not materialize. The exact opposite has happened.

STEVE SEBELIUS: 2020 election mandate? Compromise

Democrats long hoped for a supermajority in the Nevada Legislature; instead, the mixed election results will force both sides to work together to find consensus to fix vexing problems.

DAN SCHINHOFEN: More division coming up

President “projected” Biden stated that he will unite our country. Well, that’s good because his party spent the last four years dividing us. From the end of the election in 2016, the Democrats have refused to accept the results, but rather spent the last four years calling Trump illegitimate, a fraud, and of course tried to impeach him many times. The one time they actually went through with it, they knew it would fail in the Senate, but to meddle in the next election, they did it anyway, During Obama’s administration, there were many times some Republicans wanted to impeach Obama, but with the Senate being held by Harry Reid, they knew it would only be a show and cause division, so they did not.

As Mental Health Comes out of the Shadows, So Should Insurance Coverage to Increase Access to Care

Anyone who has ever tried to navigate the crazy task of selecting an individual health insurance policy knows the fundamental problem is figuring out exactly what you’re buying. Then, traversing the dizzying maze of HMOs, doctors, hospitals, co-pays, deductibles, allowable procedures, and coverage eligibility only increases the frustration.