Categorized | Feature, News

Murder trial opens with chilling 911 call

By Matt Ward

“I didn’t know you, and I am so sorry. I tried to stop you. I told you to get off our property,” jurors heard the 911 recording of a hysterical woman, captured on tape apologizing to the young man her husband had just shot and killed.

It was just after 1:30 a.m. in the early morning hours of Aug. 18, 2011. Chris Mundy, 21, sat in a borrowed car in the driveway of a Pahrump home on Benson Circle, bleeding from a bullet wound to his neck.

“I feel a pulse. Chris! Chris! Stay with us Chris! Oh my God. … He’s bleeding from the head. The side of the head,” Kathie Robbins is heard telling the county police dispatcher.

Prosecutors on the opening day of the Daniel Robbins murder trial played the 911 call before calling their first witnesses.

The recording provided a chilling glimpse into the horror of that night, when a feud online exploded into a shocking act that killed one man, injured another and sent two families reeling in its aftermath.

Daniel Robbins, a former slot machine technician with the Nevada Gaming Control Board, sat stoically in District Court Thursday as attorneys and the witnesses relived the events of that night in front of 12 jurors and two alternates.

Deputy District Attorney Tierra Jones started off the trial with her opening argument, a concise rendition of the events leading up to Mundy’s shooting death.

Mundy was killed after driving to the Robbins home in an attempt to soothe what had become a torrent of hateful back and forth messages between himself and his girlfriend’s parents. His girlfriend, then 19-year-old Jennifer Robbins, had called Mundy from jail that night and asked him to retrieve her car and belongings from her parents’ house.

“Chris attempts to reach out to his girlfriend’s mother, Kathie Robbins, on Facebook. He sends Kathie a Facebook friend request. Kathie responds to that friend request with animosity, foul language and harsh words to Chris. But Chris ignores that and he goes and he doesn’t respond. A couple of days after that, you are going to hear testimony that Jennifer called Chris from jail and Jennifer told Chris, ‘I need somebody to go over and get my car and get my things from my parents’ house.’ And Chris, being her boyfriend, agrees to do this for her. In the process of Chris attempting to get this done, he again contacts Kathie Robbins on Facebook,” Jones told the jury. “He sends Kathie Robbins a message and again Chris is met with swearing, name calling and animosity.”

Later in Jones’ opening, the prosecutor describes how Daniel Robbins gets involved in the online confrontation.

“Now the defendant joins in the Facebook conversation. The defendant gets out of bed, gets on his own Facebook page and he starts making a confrontation with Chris on Facebook, he’s engaging in the name calling, foul language and animosity on Facebook. Chris says to Kathie and the defendant that he’s on his way over to their house. He’s in Pahrump and he’s on his way over to their house. Kathie responds and tells him, ‘I will have the police waiting for you.’ But, that is not what happened. When Chris arrived at that house, the police were not waiting for Chris.

“An angry, enraged Daniel Robbins was waiting for Chris when he got there,” Jones told the court.

Mundy was indeed in Pahrump that night, though he and his girlfriend — he and Jennifer had been dating only two months before the incident; they met at a local nursing home where they both worked — had recently moved to Las Vegas. Mundy was at his best friend’s house along with another friend named Donald Cleveland and a then 14-year-old Pablo Flores. Cleveland and Flores told the jury they witnessed Mundy communicating via the Internet the night of the shooting and when Mundy decided to go over to the Robbins home, both testified that they had a bad feeling about it. Mundy went anyway.

Cleveland testified that his friend was so upset about engaging in a verbal dispute with his new girlfriend’s parents that he wanted to smooth the fracas over.

“He just wanted to go over there and squash it,” he said. “I figured he was doing everything he always did, he avoided conflict. That’s what he did. He wanted to make peace.”

Asked whether he’d tried to stop Mundy, Cleveland said he had mixed feelings about it.

“I kind of wanted him to, but also no. I wanted him to so that everything was done and over with. But at the same time I was kind of worried. His mind was set, about going over there and making peace,” he said.

Mundy took Flores with him that night to act as a witness. Peace is not what they found.

The defense case

Daniel Robbins is hoping the jury believes two things: First, that the gun he held to Mundy’s neck that night accidentally discharged; second, that Mundy’s death would never have occurred if the young man had just heeded the multiple warnings he and his wife, and even his own girlfriend, gave him about not going to the family’s home.

Daniel Robbins’ defense attorney Arnold Weinstock summed up the matter in his opening on Thursday.

“The testimony will tell you again, and in some salty language, that Daniel Robbins made it clear he was not welcomed at their house, not to come. If he does come, Daniel Robbins will do what he needs to do. And you will see Facebook messages from Christopher Mundy basically saying, and I’m paraphrasing, Christopher Mundy saying ‘I don’t care, you don’t scare me,’” Weinstock told the jury.

The attorney asked jurors to note that Mundy showed up in a car, late at night, pulled into the Robbins driveway and sat there with the headlights on and car running as the events unfolded.

“You couldn’t see who was in the car. You couldn’t see how many people were in the car. You couldn’t see what, if any, weapons the people in the car had. It was dark,” the defense attorney said. “Testimony will tell you Kathie Robbins got out, and yelled, she screamed ‘Get out! Leave! Get off our property! Go! . . . That’s what a normal, rational, reasonable person would do.”

Later Weinstock describes a scenario where Daniel Robbins, hearing his wife screaming in the front yard, grabs a gun and goes to her defense.

“You’re asked to leave repeatedly, you go. Christopher Mundy didn’t. Christopher Mundy stayed there. Kathie Robbins kept yelling. At some point in time, Daniel Robbins is inside the house. He hears his wife yelling and screaming. He got his gun, loaded his gun and went out to see what was going on. Testimony is going to tell you, he saw a car, lights on, engine running — and ladies and gentlemen, I would submit to you a car with its engine running is a deadly weapon, it and of itself; a vehicle with its engine running is a deadly weapon — and testimony will tell you Daniel Robbins yelled, ‘Get off my property! Get out! Leave!’” Weinstock tells the jury.

Finally, Daniel Robbins shot a warning shot into Mundy’s bumper. While the young passenger, Flores, said he ducked for cover, Mundy froze, seeming to await his fate.

“How many times was Christopher Mundy asked, warned, begged, cajoled, call it whatever you will, how many times was Christopher Mundy told to leave? Get off my property? Daniel Robbins, not knowing who was in that car, not knowing how many people were in that car, not knowing what weapons people in that car could have had, knowing that his wife, his children, his wife’s elderly disabled parents were in that area, doing what a man needs to do, which is to protect his family, himself and his property,” Weinstock said.

Describing the final scenario where Mundy is killed, Weinstock first refers to the shooting as an accident. He says the gun went off as Daniel Robbins was warning Mundy to leave yet again.

“He gets his gun and he points it. He starts to say ‘get off,’ meaning to say ‘get off my property,’ and he gets one word out, ‘get off’ and the gun goes off. Kathie Robbins, who is behind when she sees her husband have a gun pointed, she starts running up to Daniel Robbins and the gun goes off,” the lawyer said.

“Yes, ladies and gentleman, Christopher Mundy was shot. Yes, Christopher Mundy was killed. That, as I said, is a tragedy. But I submit to you ladies and gentlemen, based upon the evidence, as you listen to the evidence, think about who caused this. Whose fault is this? Who started the email battle? Who was told by Jennifer Robbins not to come to the house? Who was told by his friends don’t come to the house? Who was told by Facebook, both by Kathie Robbins and Daniel Robbins, ‘don’t come to the house?’ Who came to the house anyways? And at the house, who is told repeatedly, ‘get out, leave, go, we don’t want you?’ Who ignored that? Who had a warning shot, a warning shot, fired into their car, hitting a bumper of the car, letting them know this is not games, you’re on my property, get off, go? Who ignored that? The answer is, ladies and gentlemen, it’s Christopher Mundy.”

Kathie Robbins on the stand

After her daughter took the stand to describe phone calls she made from jail — she was arrested on Aug. 17, 2011 for fighting with a sister — Kathie Robbins was called to testify.

Prosecutors used the opportunity to press the defendant’s wife about her role in instigating the confrontation with Mundy.

It started with a Facebook friend request from Mundy on Aug. 16. The reply Kathie Robbins returned started the events toward their tragic end.

“Do not contact me. I don’t know and don’t care to know you. You are nothing but garbage to my family and if you were any kind of man, you would leave Jennifer until her family situation is settled. How dare you take her away from us,” evidence submitted in the case revealed.

Mundy’s response was not so personal, though Weinstock suggested it amounted to a besmirching of the Robbins as parents.

“That’s fine, but alas, I’m not the one who put her in jail hahah, so-called parents. You know what’s so funny, I never took your daughter away from you, last time I checked she was 19. When are you going to get it through your thick f**king head she left on her own. Yeah I’m not perfect, but who is? Looks like you’re not either. It takes a lot to put your own child in jail, crazy sh*t. You and your whole family can think what they want about me, I’m not going anywhere,” his reply to Kathie Robbins reads.

Kathie Robbins’ response is too vulgar to reprint here. She essentially curses him out and tells him to drop dead. It’s apparent not only that Kathie Robbins is angry about Mundy contacting her but also about his relationship with her daughter.

“If you did not poison her innocent mind, she would still be here going to school and actually doing something with her life. Not like you. You’ll go somewhere guaranteed, just not with her. Jennifer will eventually come to her senses and will drop you like the f**king piece of sh*t you are. You will never be welcome here, so if you think you will be guess again. Why don’t you email my husband instead of talking to me. Oh did you forget your big boy pants?” the response reads.

At one point, Mundy asks about coming over to the Robbins house. Kathie Robbins says to him that the cops will be waiting for him.

Jones used this statement in her opening argument.

“Kathie doesn’t call 911 until after Chris and Pablo have both been shot and Chris is taking his last breath,” the prosecutor said.

Testimony in the case is set to resume Friday morning. The court has scheduled the trial over three weeks, about three days each week for a total of nine days. Attorneys, however, on both sides say the case could go to the jury in as little as five days.

Daniel Robbins faces life in prison for killing Mundy. The bullet that struck the young man also struck and injured Flores.

The Pahrump Valley Times will bring you more about this case as it unfolds.

Reporter Kelsey Givens contributed to this story.

29 Responses


  1. NV Gal says:

    Kathie Robbins indeed should have called the Police as she said she would. Too bad they allowed anger to rock their world. This is what the Police are for to KEEP THE PEACE.

  2. Poofdirt says:

    The act of murder starts as hatred of another in ones heart. We are all guilty at some point in our lifetime.

  3. lrmorin says:

    I think Kathie did good, she told Mundy to leave the property until she called 911 to get Mundy off the property and should of left in the first place without getting hurt. He is deserved it..

  4. Kime says:

    Chris was my friend and co-worker. No one deserves to be treated the way he was by his then Girlfriends family. she was 19 and could make her own choices. Chris was going somewhere in his life The Robbins didn’t know him like she says in the 911 call so she had no right to think anything. As for her daughter I worked with her a short time as well and she is not an Innocent little girl. People need to not take the law into their own hands and call the police instead of packing a gun and shooting it at anyone or anything. I am going to forever miss Chris as I know his family will. This should of never happened even if someone comes to my house late at night I call 911 before I pull out my gun and start yelling at people in my drive way. And I am home alone every night with a baby, while my husband works.

    • AlsoConcerned says:

      I understand that you knew this man, but these people didn’t and there was obviously some very bad blood between them. I would never want anyone you didn’t know or someone you had trouble with before show up at your home in the middle of the night when you where home alone with your baby. We always think that of course we’d act exactly right in these emergency situations, but really how can we know for sure. Thank God not all of us have to find out.

    • Nrobbins216 says:

      Any one with pictures on his facebook of himself half naked surrounded by half naked men and alcohol is probably not going very far.

  5. America101 says:

    Who goes to anybody’s house at such an ungodly hour in the pitch black of morning night to make peace? Yeah… that makes as much sense as taking a middle school boy with him to be a “witness”. What???

    • AlsoConcerned says:

      Right, I’m trying to stay objective but the idea of going over there in the middle of the night to make peace just makes no sense to me at all. It’s just not something anyone would do.

  6. OverTheHump says:

    This case is really very simple. It all boils down to what a “prudent” man would do. Would a prudent man;

    1. Stay in his home and call 911 because a crazed lunatic was in the driveway.

    2. Go out and defend his “castle” because he has the right to do so.

    I am surprised nobody has drawn the similarity between this case and the “stand your ground” case in Florida. The two cases are strikingly similar.

  7. DouC says:

    This was murder and the young man did not deserve any of this just because he went over there. The young man did not have a weapon and was seated in a vehicle. When the suspect put a gun at this young mans head he was in the wrong and if he had any weapons training he would know this.
    Now if the victim had been entering the suspects home then the suspect would have a more believable claim of self defense. All the suspect had to do was stay inside and wait for the police and keep his big enraged mouth shut along with his wife. Then had the victim approached his home and tried to force entry then it would be a different story.
    I do not know any of these people, I am speaking from what most people lack, common sense. No matter what anyone thinks or says the point of all of this is “you never draw a weapon unless you intend to kill someone”. This man drew a weapon and took a life and he was in the wrong, period.

    • Nrobbins216 says:

      Isn’t a vehicle a weapon? Anything can be considered a weapon.

      So you’re supposed to wait inside your house until the person comes in, then you can defend yourself? Then it’s way too late. Asking them to leave they shouldve left unless they had malice in their heart.

      “I do not know any of these people”…so then why are you jabbing at their character? Why are you even involved in commenting on this?

      • guess again says:

        unless his car could drive sideways then NO IT IS NOT A WEAPON…. especially parked. the very young mr. mundy was sitting in his PARKED CAR when robbins came up to the driver SIDE of his car and shot him point blank.
        robbins knew damn well what he was doing and what he did was commit cold blooded murder.
        people can defend him and try to justify what he did all they want but when reality finaly sets in and robbins is sitting in jail for the rest of his life you will all learn that trespassing is not an excuse to use deadly force.

        • Nrobbins216 says:

          The car was facing forward at him at the beginning. All Mundy had to do was drive forward and run Robbins over. That’s a weapon. Anything is a weapon. If someone killed someone by stabbing them with a spoon, the spoon would be considered a weapon.

          Also, Guess Again, you’re using some big assumptions. You’re not involved in this case. If you were, you wouldn’t hide behind a screen name.

  8. moonstruck says:

    @DouC : well said I mean if Mr.Robbins came out of his house with a gun already in his hand,most people would its an intented to be used. Besides that the Police could have been called and then Mr. Robbins wouldnt be in so much trouble.and Mr. Mundy wouldnt be dead and a young boy hurt,and Why didnt the wife call the Police. Tring to take things into ur own hands,is not the Way to Go.

  9. bungicord says:

    Taking anothers life is only justified if one is saving himself or others from eminent lose of life. Neither one of these guys showed the common sense they were born with. One of the problems with facebook heros is they usually havent a clue how to act in a realtime emergency.
    If someone is parked in the driveway and you cant see in his car, call the cops stay in the house and keep your eye on the car and your gun in reach. Lay low till he starts shooting up the place or beats your door down. Only then are you justified in returning fire. I ain’t gonna judge either guy thats up to a jury, but I’ve carried a gun legally for over 40 years and I’ve never had to use it. I’d much rather use my fists.

  10. America101 says:

    I’m literally face palming myself, y’all are dumb.

  11. kam says:

    Such irrational behavior by the parents sound like drugs and/or alcohol were involved. This will probably come out later in the trial, if the police so noted. It sounds like the apple didn’t fall far from the tree either if the daughters settle disputes by fighting to the point one landed in jail. I’m glad this family doesn’t live in my neighborhood. Such negativity and hatefulness seems to permeate their world. I don’t want it in mine.

    • Nrobbins216 says:

      1. This family does not use drugs or alcohol. In fact, their daughters are actually model citizens, with the oldest daughter receieving over $14,000 in COMMUNITY SUPPORT SCHOLARSHIPS for college. They also help run the Pahrump Relay for Life. Quite irrational, indeed.

      2. Oh and Kam, false accusations can lead you to being sued. Be careful.

    • Nrobbins216 says:

      The entire family is willing to be drug tested. Are you?

      • guess again says:

        their daughters are model citizens you say?
        yet this all stemed from one of them going to jail…. well maybe in the robbins world that would be a model citizen…. in the real world…not so much.

        • Nrobbins216 says:

          Yes they are. Everyone makes mistakes.

          The oldest daughter graduated PVHS with over $14,000 in community scholarships, graduated president of her school in college in 3 years and now works with her dream company a year out of school.

          The youngest daughter is the top of her class with her sights set on the ivy league.

  12. Leanna says:

    Murder is murder however you look at it. Unless the kid was in the house they had no right to shoot him. They TOLD him the cops would be waiting, why didn’t they call the cops when the guy was in the yard?

    • Nrobbins216 says:

      Why would somebody come over to someone’s house when they say the cops would be waiting? The parents had no definitive proof that this was the person they were talking to on Facebook in the driveway. If a person says to leave, they need to leave. Sitting there was the wrong thing to do.

  13. Common Sense says:

    You do the crime you do the time, plain and simple

Leave a Reply


You must be logged in to post a comment.

phone book 2013